FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
ZTE nubia Red Magic 7 vs BLU View 3
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the ZTE nubia Red Magic 7 on one side and the BLU View 3 on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 3.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Smartphone | ZTE nubia Red Magic 7 | BLU View 3 | ||||||
| Model version(s) | nubia NX679J |
B140DL, View 3 |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2022 | Q4 2021 | ||||||
| Network | 5G, CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,72 x 3,08 x 0,37 in | 6,31 x 3,02 x 0,35 in | ||||||
| Weight | 7.58 oz | 6.28 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front and back glass, aluminum frame |
Front glass, plastic body |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.8 inches, 700 nits, 1B colours | 6.0 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | AMOLED, 165Hz | IPS LCD | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 720 x 1440 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 18:9 | ||||||
| Density | 387 ppi | 268 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 12; Redmagic 5.0 | Android 11 | ||||||
| Processor | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | MediaTek MT6762 Helio P22 | ||||||
| Lithography | 4 nm 4LPE | 12 nm | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x Qualcomm Kryo Silver @ 1.80 GHz |
- |
||||||
| High performance cores | 1x Qualcomm Kryo Prime @ 3.0 GHz, 3x Qualcomm Kryo Gold @ 2.5 GHz |
8x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 730 | Imagination PowerVR GE8320 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 3 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 768 | 64 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 818 MHz | 650 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 2,764.8 GFLOPS | 41.6 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 8 / 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 / 512 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | - | Up to 128 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 64 MP, f/1,8, 26mm, 8 MP, f/2,0, 13mm,1,12µm 2 MP, f/2,4 |
13 MP |
||||||
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 8 MP, f/2,0 |
8 MP |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
720p@30fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 3,400 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 10 hours and 20 minutes | ~ 10 hours and 20 minutes | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 1,036,073 | 72,207 | ||||||
| Android PassMark Rating | 17,026 | 3,562 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 6,842 | 656 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 15,738 | 3,197 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 1,220 | 148 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 3,751 | 816 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of ZTE nubia Red Magic 7 is greater. The ZTE nubia Red Magic 7 has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
ZTE nubia Red Magic 7 |
1,036,073 |
| BLU View 3 |
72,207 |
The difference is 1335%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Android PassMark Rating | |
|---|---|
| ZTE nubia Red Magic 7 |
17,026 |
| BLU View 3 |
3,562 |
The difference in performance is 378%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| ZTE nubia Red Magic 7 |
6,842 15,738 |
| BLU View 3 |
656 3,197 |
In single core, the difference is 943%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 392%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| ZTE nubia Red Magic 7 |
1,220 3,751 |
| BLU View 3 |
148 816 |
In single core, the difference is 724%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 360%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
ZTE nubia Red Magic 2ZTE nubia Red Magic 3ZTE nubia Red Magic 3SZTE nubia Red Magic 5GZTE nubia Red Magic 5SZTE nubia Red Magic 6ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 ProZTE nubia Red Magic 6RZTE nubia Red Magic 6S ProZTE nubia Red Magic 7 ProZTE nubia Red Magic 7S ProZTE nubia Red Magic 8 ProZTE nubia Red Magic 8 Pro+ZTE nubia Red Magic MarsBLU View 2
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.