FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
ZTE nubia Red Magic 6S Pro vs Google Pixel 5
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the ZTE nubia Red Magic 6S Pro on one side and the Google Pixel 5 on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 3.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.4GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | ZTE nubia Red Magic 6S Pro | Google Pixel 5 | ||||||
| Model version(s) | nubia NX669J |
GD1YQ, GTT9Q |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2021 | Q4 2020 | ||||||
| Network | 5G, CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE | 5G, CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,69 x 3,04 x 0,37 in | 5,70 x 2,77 x 0,31 in | ||||||
| Weight | 7.58 oz | 5.33 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front and back glass, aluminum frame |
Front glass, aluminum body |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.8 inches, 700 nits, 1B colours | 6.0 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | AMOLED, 165Hz | OLED, 90Hz | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1080 x 2340 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 | ||||||
| Density | 387 ppi | 432 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 11; Redmagic 4.5 | Android 11 | ||||||
| Processor | Qualcomm SM8350-AC Snapdragon 888+ 5G | Qualcomm SM7250-AB Snapdragon 765G 5G | ||||||
| Lithography | 5 nm (5LPE) | 7 nm LPP EUV | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x Qualcomm Kryo 680 Silver @ 1.8 GHz |
6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.8 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | 1x Qualcomm Kryo 680 Prime @ 3.0 GHz 3x Qualcomm Kryo 680 Gold @ 2.42 GHz |
1x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.4 GHz 1x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 660 | Qualcomm Adreno 620 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 3 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 512 | 192 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 840 MHz | 750 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 1,720.3 GFLOPS | - | ||||||
| Memory | 12 / 18 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 / 512 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 64 MP, f/1,8, 26mm, 8 MP, f/2,0, 13mm, 2 MP |
12,2 MP, f/1,7, 27mm, 16 MP, f/2,2 |
||||||
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 8 MP, f/2,0 |
8 MP, f/2,0, 24mm |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 5,050 mAh | 4,080 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 13 hours | ~ 11 hours and 40 minutes | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 855,961 | 279,086 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 4,977 | 2,674 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 13,983 | 6,047 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 778 | 585 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 2,644 | 1,586 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of ZTE nubia Red Magic 6S Pro is greater. The ZTE nubia Red Magic 6S Pro has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
ZTE nubia Red Magic 6S Pro |
855,961 |
| Google Pixel 5 |
279,086 |
The difference is 207%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| ZTE nubia Red Magic 6S Pro |
4,977 13,983 |
| Google Pixel 5 |
2,674 6,047 |
In single core, the difference is 86%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 131%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| ZTE nubia Red Magic 6S Pro |
778 2,644 |
| Google Pixel 5 |
585 1,586 |
In single core, the difference is 33%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 67%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Google Pixel 2Google Pixel 2 XLGoogle Pixel 3Google Pixel 3 XLGoogle Pixel 3aGoogle Pixel 3a XLGoogle Pixel 4Google Pixel 4 XLGoogle Pixel 4aGoogle Pixel 4a 5GGoogle Pixel 5a 5GGoogle Pixel 6Google Pixel 6 ProGoogle Pixel 6aGoogle Pixel 7Google Pixel 7 ProGoogle Pixel XLDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.