Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Note II

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro on Amazon USA
Samsung Galaxy Note II on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro on one side and the Samsung Galaxy Note II on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.1GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.6GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.






Specifications:


Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Samsung Galaxy Note II
Model version(s) 2015105,
M1906G7I
GT-N7100, GT-N7105, SCH-I605,
SCH-R950, SHV-E250K, SHV-E250S,
SGH-I317M, SGH-T889, SHV-E250L,
SPH-L900

Release date Q3 2019 Q4 2012
Network GSM, HSPA, LTE CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions 6,35 x 3,01 x 0,35 in 5,95 x 3,17 x 0,37 in
Weight 7.05 oz 6.31 oz
Body Front and back glass,
plastic body
Front glass,
plastic body
Screen size, colours 6.5 inches, 500 nits, 16M colours 5.5 inches, 16M colours
Screen type IPS LCD Super AMOLED
Resolution 1080 x 2340 pixels 720 x 1280 pixels
Screen ratio 19.5:9 16:9
Density 395 ppi 267 ppi
Operating system Android 9.0 Android 4.1; TouchWiz UI
Processor MediaTek MT6785V Helio G90T Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
Lithography 12 nm HPM 32 nm HKMG
Cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Energy cores 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz 2x ARM Cortex-A9 @ 1.4 GHz
High performance cores 2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.05 GHz 2x ARM Cortex-A9 @ 1.6 GHz
GPU integrated graphics ARM Mali-G76 MC4 ARM Mali-400 MP4
GPU execution units 4 4
GPU shading units 64 64
GPU base clock 800 MHz 400 MHz
GPU boost clock 800 MHz 533 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 195.8 GFLOPS 15.84 GFLOPS
Memory 6 GB RAM 3 GB RAM
Storage 64 / 128 GB 16 GB
Memory card Up to 256 GB Up to 64 GB
Photo 64 MP, f/1,9, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2, 13mm,
2 MP, f/2,4, 1/5", 1,75µm,
2 MP, f/2,4, 1/5", 1,75µm
8 MP, AF
Video 2160p30,
1080p30/60/120,
720p960
1080p30
Front photo 20 MP, f/2,0, 0,9µm 1,9 MP
Front video 1080p30 720p30
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n
Bluetooth 5.0, A2DP, LE 4.0, A2DP, LE
USB USB Type-C 2.0 microUSB 2.0
Battery capacity 4,500 mAh 3,100 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 9 hours ~ 10 hours and 10 minutes
TDP 9 W 6 W
Head SAR - -
Body SAR - -
AnTuTu 281,565 17,261
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,493 578
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
7,498 1,515
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro has more cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro is greater. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performances :


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.


AnTuTu - Total score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 281,565
Samsung Galaxy Note II 17,261


The difference is 1531%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 2,493
7,498
Samsung Galaxy Note II 578
1,515


In single core, the difference is 331%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 395%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.




GadgetVersus.com © 2022 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland