Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) vs Samsung Galaxy S20 5G Exynos

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) on Amazon USA
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G Exynos on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) on one side and the Samsung Galaxy S20 5G Exynos on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.7GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.






Specifications:


Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) Samsung Galaxy S20 5G Exynos
Model version(s) Redmi Note 3 (Mediatek) SM-G981, SM-G981F, SM-G981F/DS,
SM-G981B/DS, SM-G981N
Release date Q4 2015 Q1 2020
Network GSM, HSPA, LTE 5G, CDMA, GSM, EVDO, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions 5,91 x 2,99 x 0,34 in 5,97 x 2,72 x 0,31 in
Weight 5.78 oz 5.75 oz
Body Front glass,
aluminum body
Front and back glass,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours 5.5 inches, 16M colours 6.2 inches, 16M colours
Screen type IPS LCD Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz
Resolution 1080 x 1920 pixels 1440 x 3200 pixels
Screen ratio 16:9 20:9
Density 403 ppi 563 ppi
Operating system Android 5.0.2; MIUI 7 Android 10.0; One UI 2
Processor MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10 Samsung Exynos 990
Lithography 20 nm HPM 7 nm LPP
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 8
Energy cores - 4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.95 GHz
High performance cores 8x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz 2x Samsung Exynos M5 @ 2.73 GHz
2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.4 GHz
GPU integrated graphics Imagination PowerVR G6200 ARM Mali-G77 MP11
GPU execution units 2 11
GPU shading units 32 176
GPU clock 700 MHz 800 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 76.8 GFLOPS 1,126 GFLOPS
Memory 2 / 3 GB RAM 12 GB RAM
Storage 16 / 32 GB 128 / 512 GB
Memory card Up to 128 GB Up to 1,000 GB
Photo 13 MP, f/2,2 12 MP, f/1,8, 26mm,
64 MP, f/2,0,
12 MP, f/2,2, 13mm
Video 1080p30 4320p24,
2160p30/60,
1080p30/60/240,
720p960
Front photo 5 MP, f/2,0 10 MP, f/2,2, 26mm
Front video 1080p30 2160p30/60,
1080p30
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
Bluetooth 4.1, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
USB microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 3.1
Battery capacity 4,000 mAh 4,000 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 13 hours and 20 minutes ~ 10 hours and 30 minutes
Head SAR - -
Body SAR - -
AnTuTu 46,972 497,041
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
752 4,415
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
2,762 11,913
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Samsung Galaxy S20 5G Exynos is larger. The Samsung Galaxy S20 5G Exynos was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performances :


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.


AnTuTu - Total score
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G Exynos 497,041
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) 46,972


The difference is 958%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G Exynos 4,415
11,913
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) 752
2,762


In single core, the difference is 487%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 331%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.




GadgetVersus.com © 2022 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland