Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) vs Motorola Moto E5 Plus

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) on Amazon USA
Motorola Moto E5 Plus on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) on one side and the Motorola Moto E5 Plus on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.4GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.






Specifications:


Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Model version(s) Redmi Note 3 (Mediatek) Motorola Moto E Plus (5)
Release date Q4 2015 Q2 2018
Network GSM, HSPA, LTE CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions 5,91 x 2,99 x 0,34 in 6,33 x 2,96 x 0,37 in
Weight 5.78 oz 6.95 oz
Body Front glass,
aluminum body
Plastic front,
aluminum body
Screen size, colours 5.5 inches, 16M colours 6.0 inches, 16M colours
Screen type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Resolution 1080 x 1920 pixels 720 x 1440 pixels
Screen ratio 16:9 18:9
Density 403 ppi 268 ppi
Operating system Android 5.0.2; MIUI 7 Android 8.0
Processor MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10 Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425
Lithography 20 nm HPM 28 nm LP
Cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
High performance cores 8x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.4 GHz
GPU integrated graphics Imagination PowerVR G6200 Qualcomm Adreno 308
GPU execution units 2 1
GPU shading units 32 24
GPU clock 700 MHz 500 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 76.8 GFLOPS 24 GFLOPS
Memory 2 / 3 GB RAM 2 / 3 GB RAM
Storage 16 / 32 GB 16 / 32 GB
Memory card Up to 128 GB Up to 256 GB
Photo 13 MP, f/2,2 12 MP, f/2,0
Video 1080p30 1080p30
Front photo 5 MP, f/2,0 5 MP, f/2,0
Front video 1080p30 1080p30
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Bluetooth 4.1, A2DP, LE 4.2, A2DP, LE
USB microUSB 2.0 microUSB 2.0
Battery capacity 4,000 mAh 5,000 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 13 hours and 20 minutes ~ 18 hours
TDP - 5 W
Head SAR - -
Body SAR - -
AnTuTu 46,972 44,814
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
752 546
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
2,762 1,900
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) has more cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) is greater. The Motorola Moto E5 Plus was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performances :


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.


AnTuTu - Total score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) 46,972
Motorola Moto E5 Plus 44,814


The difference is 5%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) 752
2,762
Motorola Moto E5 Plus 546
1,900


In single core, the difference is 38%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 45%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.




GadgetVersus.com © 2022 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland