Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT on one side and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 3.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.4GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneXiaomi Poco F4 GT Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed
Model version(s)

21121210G, 21121210I

22101320C
Release dateQ3 2021 Q4 2022
Network5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE 5G, CDMA, CDMA2000, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,40 x 3,02 x 0,33 in 6,41 x 2,99 x 0,31 in
Weight7.41 oz 6.38 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front and back glass,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours6.7 inches, 800 nits, 1B colours 6.7 inches, 500 nits, 1B colours
Screen typeAMOLED, 120Hz OLED, 120Hz
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 20:9
Density395 ppi 395 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 12; MIUI 13 Android 13; MIUI 14
ProcessorQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G
Lithography4 nm 4LPE 6 nm N6
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

4x Qualcomm Kryo Silver @ 1.8 GHz

4x qualcomm Kryo 670 Silver @ 1.9 GHz
High performance cores

1x Qualcomm Kryo Prime @ 3.0 GHz,
3x Qualcomm Kryo Gold @ 2.5 GHz

1x Qualcomm Kryo 670 Prime @ 2.4 GHz
3x Qualcomm Kryo 670 Gold @ 2.2 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 730 Qualcomm Adreno 642L
GPU execution units3 2
GPU shading units768 192
GPU base clock818 MHz 490 MHz
GPU boost clock818 MHz 550 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point2,764.8 GFLOPS 844.8 GFLOPS
Memory8 / 12 GB RAM 6 / 12 GB RAM
Storage128 / 256 GB 128 / 256 GB
Photo

64 MP, f/1,9, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4

108 MP, f/1,9,
8 MP,
2 MP, f/2,4
Video

4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps,
720p@960fps

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps,
720p@960fps
Front photo

20 MP, f/2,4

16 MP
Front video

1080p@30/60fps,
720p@120fps

1080p@30/60fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE 5.2, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity4,700 mAh 5,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 11 hours and 10 minutes ~ 15 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
6,666 3,450
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
15,326 10,856
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
1,225 781
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
3,685 2,890
(Android)
Geekbench 6 single core
952 994
(Android)
Geekbench 6 multi-core
3,367 2,813
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is greater. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 6,666
15,326
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed 3,450
10,856


In single core, the difference is 93%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 41%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 1,225
3,685
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed 781
2,890


In single core, the difference is 57%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 28%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



With Android:

Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 952
3,367
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed 994
2,813


In single core, the difference is -4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 20%.


Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads.






GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland