Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs Cubot KingKong Mini 2

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT on Amazon USA
Cubot KingKong Mini 2 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT on one side and the Cubot KingKong Mini 2 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 3.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneXiaomi Poco F4 GT Cubot KingKong Mini 2
Model version(s)

21121210G, 21121210I

KingKong Mini 2, KingKong Mini2
Release dateQ3 2021 Q4 2020
Network5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE CDMA, GSM, HSPA
Dimensions6,40 x 3,02 x 0,33 in 4,69 x 2,28 x 0,48 in
Weight7.41 oz 4.34 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
plastic body
Screen size, colours6.7 inches, 800 nits, 1B colours 4.0 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeAMOLED, 120Hz IPS LCD
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 540 x 1080 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 18:9
Density395 ppi 302 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 12; MIUI 13 Android 10
ProcessorQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 MediaTek MT6761 Helio A22
Lithography4 nm 4LPE 12 nm FinFET
Cores8 4
Threads8 4
Energy cores

4x Qualcomm Kryo Silver @ 1.8 GHz

-
High performance cores

1x Qualcomm Kryo Prime @ 3.0 GHz,
3x Qualcomm Kryo Gold @ 2.5 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 730 Imagination PowerVR GE8300
GPU execution units3 4
GPU shading units768 128
GPU clock818 MHz 660 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point2,764.8 GFLOPS 20.8 GFLOPS
Memory8 / 12 GB RAM 3 GB RAM
Storage128 / 256 GB 32 GB
Memory card- Up to 128 GB
Photo

64 MP, f/1,9, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4

13 MP, f/2,2
Video

4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps,
720p@960fps

1080p@30fps
Front photo

20 MP, f/2,4

8 MP
Front video

1080p@30/60fps,
720p@120fps

480p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE 4.2, A2DP
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type C 2.0
Battery capacity4,700 mAh 3,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 11 hours and 10 minutes ~ 9 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu968,376 71,133
Android PassMark Rating13,693 1,340
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
6,666 776
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
15,326 1,737
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
1,225 145
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
3,685 460
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Xiaomi Poco F4 GT has more cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is greater. The Xiaomi Poco F4 GT has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 968,376
Cubot KingKong Mini 2 71,133


The difference is 1261%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 13,693
Cubot KingKong Mini 2 1,340


The difference in performance is 922%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 6,666
15,326
Cubot KingKong Mini 2 776
1,737


In single core, the difference is 759%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 782%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 1,225
3,685
Cubot KingKong Mini 2 145
460


In single core, the difference is 745%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 701%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



See also:

Cubot KingKong Mini 2 ProCubot KingKong Mini 3




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.