Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs Asus ROG Phone 6D

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT on Amazon USA
Asus ROG Phone 6D on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT on one side and the Asus ROG Phone 6D on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 3.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.

Specification comparison:

SmartphoneXiaomi Poco F4 GT Asus ROG Phone 6D
Model version(s)

21121210G, 21121210I

Release dateQ3 2021 Q4 2022
Dimensions6,40 x 3,02 x 0,33 in 6,81 x 3,03 x 0,41 in
Weight7.41 oz 8.43 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front and back glass,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours6.7 inches, 800 nits, 1B colours 6.8 inches, 800 nits, 1B colours
Screen typeAMOLED, 120Hz AMOLED, 165Hz
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2448 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 20.4:9
Density395 ppi 395 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 12; MIUI 13 Android 12
ProcessorQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 MediaTek Dimensity 9000+
Lithography4 nm 4LPE 4 nm N4
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

4x Qualcomm Kryo Silver @ 1.8 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A510 @ 1.8 GHz
High performance cores

1x Qualcomm Kryo Prime @ 3.0 GHz,
3x Qualcomm Kryo Gold @ 2.5 GHz

1x ARM Cortex-X2 @ 3.2 GHz,
3x ARM Cortex-A710 @ 2.85 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 730 ARM Mali-G710 MC10
GPU execution units3 10
GPU shading units768 160
GPU clock818 MHz 850 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point2,764.8 GFLOPS 1,648 GFLOPS
Memory8 / 12 GB RAM 12 / 16 GB RAM
Storage128 / 256 GB 256 GB

64 MP, f/1,9, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4

50 MP, f/1,9, 24mm,
13 MP, f/2,2, 13mm,
5 MP


Front photo

20 MP, f/2,4

12 MP, 28mm
Front video


WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE 5.3, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.1
Battery capacity4,700 mAh 6,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 11 hours and 10 minutes ~ 18 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu968,376 1,132,704
Geekbench 4 single core
6,666 4,963
Geekbench 4 multi-core
15,326 13,758
Geekbench 5 single core
1,225 1,393
Geekbench 5 multi-core
3,685 4,496
Geekbench 6 single core
952 1,895
Geekbench 6 multi-core
3,367 4,997

We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Asus ROG Phone 6D is larger. The Asus ROG Phone 6D was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.

AnTuTu - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 6D 1,132,704
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 968,376

The difference is 17%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 6,666
Asus ROG Phone 6D 4,963

In single core, the difference is 34%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 11%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Asus ROG Phone 6D 1,393
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 1,225

In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 22%.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

With Android:

Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Asus ROG Phone 6D 1,895
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 952

In single core, the difference is 99%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 48%.

Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads.

See also:

Asus ROG Phone 6Asus ROG Phone 6 ProAsus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate

GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland