FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs Asus ROG Phone 5s Pro
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT on one side and the Asus ROG Phone 5s Pro on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 3.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | Asus ROG Phone 5s Pro | ||||||
| Model version(s) | 21121210G, 21121210I | ZS676KS | ||||||
| Release date | Q3 2021 | Q3 2021 | ||||||
| Network | 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE | 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,40 x 3,02 x 0,33 in | 6,80 x 3,04 x 0,39 in | ||||||
| Weight | 7.41 oz | 8.40 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front and back glass, aluminum frame |
Front and back glass, aluminum frame | ||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.7 inches, 800 nits, 1B colours | 6.8 inches, 1000 nits, 1B colours | ||||||
| Screen type | AMOLED, 120Hz | AMOLED, 144Hz | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1080 x 2448 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 | ||||||
| Density | 395 ppi | 395 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 12; MIUI 13 | Android 11; ROG UI | ||||||
| Processor | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8350-AC Snapdragon 888+ 5G | ||||||
| Lithography | 4 nm 4LPE | 5 nm (5LPE) | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x Qualcomm Kryo Silver @ 1.8 GHz |
4x Qualcomm Kryo 680 Silver @ 1.8 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores | 1x Qualcomm Kryo Prime @ 3.0 GHz, 3x Qualcomm Kryo Gold @ 2.5 GHz |
1x Qualcomm Kryo 680 Prime @ 3.0 GHz 3x Qualcomm Kryo 680 Gold @ 2.42 GHz | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 730 | Qualcomm Adreno 660 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 3 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 768 | 512 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 818 MHz | 840 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 2,764.8 GFLOPS | 1,720.3 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 8 / 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 / 256 GB | 512 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 64 MP, f/1,9, 26mm, 8 MP, f/2,2, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
64 MP, f/1,8, 26mm, 13 MP, f/2,4, 11mm, 5 MP, f/2,0 |
||||||
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps | ||||||
| Front photo | 20 MP, f/2,4 |
24 MP, f/2,5, 27mm |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
1080p@30fps | ||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 6,000 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 11 hours and 10 minutes | ~ 23 hours | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 968,376 | 837,336 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 1,225 | 1,015 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 3,685 | 3,115 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, they have an identical turbo frequency. They were produced the same year.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total Score | |
|---|---|
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | 968,376 |
| Asus ROG Phone 5s Pro | 837,336 |
The difference is 16%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
With Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Xiaomi Poco F4 GT |
1,225 3,685 |
| Asus ROG Phone 5s Pro |
1,015 3,115 |
In single core, the difference is 21%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 18%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.