Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy S5 (octa-core)

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite on Amazon USA
Samsung Galaxy S5 (octa-core) on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite on one side and the Samsung Galaxy S5 (octa-core) on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.2GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.1GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.


Smartphone Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite Samsung Galaxy S5 (octa-core)
Model version(s) M1910F4G, M2002F4LG Samsung SM-G900H
Release date Q2 2020 Q2 2014
Dimensions 6,21 x 2,92 x 0,38 in 5,59 x 2,85 x 0,32 in
Weight 7.20 oz 5.11 oz
Body Front and back glass,
aluminum frame
Plastic body
Screen size, colours 6.5 inches, 430 nits, 16M colours 5.1 inches, 16M colours
Screen type Super AMOLED Super AMOLED
Resolution 1080 x 2340 pixels 1080 x 1920 pixels
Screen ratio 19.5:9 16:9
Density 398 ppi 432 ppi
Operating system Android 9.0 Android 4.4.2
Processor Qualcomm SM7150-AB Snapdragon 730G Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5422
Lithography 8 nm LPP 28 nm HKMG
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 8
Energy cores 6x Qualcomm Kryo 470 Silver @ 1.8 GHz 4x ARM Cortex-A7 @ 1.5 GHz
High performance cores 2x Qualcomm Kryo 470 Gold @ 2.2 GHz 4x ARM Cortex-A15 @ 2.1 GHz
GPU integrated graphics Qualcomm Adreno 618 ARM Mali-T628 MP6
GPU execution units 2 6
GPU shading units 128 96
GPU clock rate 610 MHz 533 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 435.2 GFLOPS 102.4 GFLOPS
Memory 6 / 8 GB RAM 2 GB RAM
Storage 64 / 128 GB 16 / 32 GB
Memory card - Up to 256 GB
Photo 64 MP, f/1,9, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
5 MP, f/2,4
16 MP, 1/2,6"
Video 2160p30,
Front photo 16 MP, f/2,5 2 MP
Front video 1080p30 1080p30
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth 5.0, A2DP, LE 4.0, A2DP, LE
USB USB Type-C 2.0 microUSB 3.0
Battery capacity 5,260 mAh 2,800 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 17 hours ~ 11 hours
TDP 8 W 6 W
Head SAR - -
Body SAR - -
AnTuTu 273,129 28,571
Android PassMark Rating 6,587 1,023
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,110 762
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
6,760 2,060

We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is greater. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.

AnTuTu - Total score
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 273,129
Samsung Galaxy S5 (octa-core) 28,571

The difference is 856%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

Android PassMark Rating
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 6,587
Samsung Galaxy S5 (octa-core) 1,023

The difference in performance is 544%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 2,110
Samsung Galaxy S5 (octa-core) 762

In single core, the difference is 177%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 228%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

GadgetVersus.com © 2021 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland