Xiaomi Mi CC9 vs Pine64 PinePhone

Xiaomi Mi CC9 on Amazon USA
Pine64 PinePhone on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Xiaomi Mi CC9 on one side and the Pine64 PinePhone on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.2GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.

Specification comparison:

SmartphoneXiaomi Mi CC9 Pine64 PinePhone
Model version(s)

Xiaomi Mi CC 9

Release dateQ3 2019 Q1 2020
Dimensions6,17 x 2,93 x 0,34 in 6,33 x 3,02 x 0,44 in
Weight6.31 oz 7.59 oz
BodyBack glass,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
plastic body
Screen size, colours6.4 inches, 430 nits, 16M colours 6.0 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeSuper AMOLED IPS LCD, 60Hz
Resolution1080 x 2340 pixels 720 x 1440 pixels
Screen ratio19.5:9 18:9
Density403 ppi 268 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 9 Android 10; Ubunutu
ProcessorQualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 Allwinner A64
Lithography10 nm LPP 40 nm
Cores8 4
Threads8 4
Energy cores

6x Qualcomm Kryo 360 Silver @ 1.7 GHz

High performance cores

2x Qualcomm Kryo 360 Gold @ 2.2 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.152 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 616 ARM Mali-400 MP2
GPU execution units2 2
GPU shading units128 32
GPU base clock650 MHz 200 MHz
GPU boost clock650 MHz 600 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point384 GFLOPS 10.8 GFLOPS
Memory6 / 8 GB RAM 2 / 3 GB RAM
Storage64 / 256 GB 64 GB
Memory card- Up to 256 GB

48 MP, f/1,8,
8 MP,
2 MP

5 MP


Front photo

32 MP, f/2,0

2 MP, f/2,8
Front video


WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE 4.0
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C
Battery capacity4,030 mAh 3,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use)- ~ 9 hours
TDP6 W -
Geekbench 4 single core
1,680 484
Geekbench 4 multi-core
5,303 1,247

We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Xiaomi Mi CC9 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Mi CC9 is greater. The Pine64 PinePhone was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.

With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Mi CC9 1,680
Pine64 PinePhone 484

In single core, the difference is 247%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 325%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

See also:

Xiaomi Mi CC9e

Pine64 PinePhone Pro

GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland