Xiaomi Mi CC9 vs Google Pixel 6a

Xiaomi Mi CC9 on Amazon USA
Google Pixel 6a on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Xiaomi Mi CC9 on one side and the Google Pixel 6a on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.2GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.8GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.

Specification comparison:

SmartphoneXiaomi Mi CC9 Google Pixel 6a
Model version(s)

Xiaomi Mi CC 9

Release dateQ3 2019 Q3 2022
Dimensions6,17 x 2,93 x 0,34 in 5,99 x 2,83 x 0,35 in
Weight6.31 oz 6.28 oz
BodyBack glass,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
aluminum frame,
plastic back
Screen size, colours6.4 inches, 430 nits, 16M colours 6.1 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeSuper AMOLED OLED
Resolution1080 x 2340 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Screen ratio19.5:9 20:9
Density403 ppi 429 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 9 Android 12
ProcessorQualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 Google Tensor
Lithography10 nm LPP 5 nm LPE
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

6x Qualcomm Kryo 360 Silver @ 1.7 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.8 GHz
High performance cores

2x Qualcomm Kryo 360 Gold @ 2.2 GHz

2x ARM Cortex-X1 @ 2.80 GHz
2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.25 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 616 ARM Mali-G78 MP20
GPU execution units2 20
GPU shading units128 320
GPU clock650 MHz 848 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point384 GFLOPS 1,943 GFLOPS
Memory6 / 8 GB RAM 6 GB RAM
Storage64 / 256 GB 128 GB

48 MP, f/1,8,
8 MP,
2 MP

12,2 MP, f/1,7, 27mm,
12 MP, f/2,2, 17mm


Front photo

32 MP, f/2,0

8 MP, f/2,0, 24mm
Front video


WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE 5.2, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.1
Battery capacity4,030 mAh 4,410 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)- ~ 24 hours
TDP6 W 9 W
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu143,964 732,389
Android PassMark Rating5,565 14,024
Geekbench 4 single core
1,680 4,767
Geekbench 4 multi-core
5,303 11,754

We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Google Pixel 6a is larger. The Google Pixel 6a was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.

AnTuTu - Total Score
Google Pixel 6a 732,389
Xiaomi Mi CC9 143,964

The difference is 409%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

Android PassMark Rating
Google Pixel 6a 14,024
Xiaomi Mi CC9 5,565

The difference in performance is 152%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Google Pixel 6a 4,767
Xiaomi Mi CC9 1,680

In single core, the difference is 184%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 122%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

See also:

Xiaomi Mi CC9e

Google Pixel 6Google Pixel 6 Pro

GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland