Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Note9 SD845

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra on Amazon USA
Samsung Galaxy Note9 SD845 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra on one side and the Samsung Galaxy Note9 SD845 on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.8GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.8GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.






Specifications:


Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Samsung Galaxy Note9 SD845
Model version(s)

M2102K1G

SCV40, SM-N9600, SM-N960U,
SM-N960U1, SM-N960W
Release date Q2 2021 Q4 2018
Network 5G, CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions 6,47 x 2,94 x 0,33 in 6,37 x 3,01 x 0,35 in
Weight 8.25 oz 7.09 oz
Body Front glass,
ceramic back,
aluminum frame
Front and back glass,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours 6.8 inches, 900 nits, 1B colours 6.4 inches, 16M colours
Screen type AMOLED, 120Hz Super AMOLED
Resolution 1440 x 3200 pixels 1440 x 2960 pixels
Screen ratio 20:9 18.5:9
Density 515 ppi 516 ppi
Operating system Android 11; MIUI 12.5 Android 8.1
Processor Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845
Lithography 5 nm (5LPE) 10 nm FinFET LPP
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 8
Energy cores

4x Qualcomm Kryo 680 Silver @ 1.8 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.9 GHz
High performance cores

1x Qualcomm Kryo 680 Prime @ 2.84 GHz
3x Qualcomm Kryo 680 Gold @ 2.42 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.8 GHz
GPU integrated graphics Qualcomm Adreno 660 Qualcomm Adreno 630
GPU execution units 2 2
GPU shading units 512 256
GPU clock 840 MHz 710 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 1,720.3 GFLOPS 737 GFLOPS
Memory 8 / 12 GB RAM 6 / 8 GB RAM
Storage 256 GB 128 / 512 GB
Memory card - Up to 512 GB
Photo

50 MP, f/2,0, 24mm
48 MP, f/4,1, 120mm
48 MP, f/2,2, 12mm

12 MP, f/1,5-2,4, 26mm
Video

8K@24fps,
4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60fps

4K@60fps,
1080p@240fps,
720p@960fps
Front photo

20 MP, f/2,2, 27mm

12 MP, f/2,4, 52mm
Front video

1080p@30/60fps,
720p@120fps

1440p@30fps
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth 5.2, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
USB USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.1
Battery capacity 5,000 mAh 4,000 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 15 hours ~ 12 hours and 10 minutes
TDP - 9 W
DxOMark - 103
AnTuTu 698,732 342,142
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
5,076 2,352
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
14,977 8,468
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is greater. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performances :


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.


AnTuTu - Total score
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra 698,732
Samsung Galaxy Note9 SD845 342,142


The difference is 104%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra 5,076
14,977
Samsung Galaxy Note9 SD845 2,352
8,468


In single core, the difference is 116%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 77%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.




GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland