FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 vs Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016)
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 on one side and the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016) on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 3.2GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.4GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 | Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016) | ||||||
| Model version(s) | PAR-A0 | SM-J7108, SM-J710F, SM-J710FN, SM-J710FQ, SM-J710H, SM-J710GN, SM-J710K, SM-J710M, SM-J710MN | ||||||
| Release date | Q2 2022 | Q2 2016 | ||||||
| Network | 5G, CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,45 x 3,00 x 0,39 in | 5,97 x 2,99 x 0,31 in | ||||||
| Weight | 7.69 oz | 6.00 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, aluminum body |
Front glass, plastic body | ||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.7 inches, 1300 nits, 16M colours | 5.5 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | AMOLED, 144Hz | Super AMOLED | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 16:9 | ||||||
| Density | 395 ppi | 267 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 12; Joy UI 13 | Android 6.0.1 | ||||||
| Processor | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm MSM8952 Snapdragon 617 | ||||||
| Lithography | 7 nm N7FF+ | 28 nm LP | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Silver @ 1.8 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.2 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores | 1x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Prime @ 3.2 GHz 3x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Gold @ 2.4 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.4 GHz | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | Qualcomm Adreno 405 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 1 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 512 | 48 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 670 MHz | 550 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 1,372.1 GFLOPS | 52.8 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 8 / 12 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 / 256 GB | 16 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | - | Up to 128 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 64 MP, f/1,8, 13 MP, f/2,4, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
13 MP, f/1,9, 28mm |
||||||
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps |
1080p@30fps | ||||||
| Front photo | 16 MP |
5 MP, f/1,9 |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
- | ||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 4.1, A2DP | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 4,650 mAh | 3,300 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Ion | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 13 hours and 40 minutes | ~ 17 hours | ||||||
| TDP | - | 3 W | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 725,214 | 45,457 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 single core | 4,445 | 692 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 11,703 | 3,278 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 992 | 156 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 3,123 | 689 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Black Shark 5 is greater. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total Score | |
|---|---|
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 | 725,214 |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016) | 45,457 |
The difference is 1495%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
With Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Xiaomi Black Shark 5 |
4,445 11,703 |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016) |
692 3,278 |
In single core, the difference is 542%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 257%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
With Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Xiaomi Black Shark 5 |
992 3,123 |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016) |
156 689 |
In single core, the difference is 536%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 353%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Xiaomi Black Shark 2Xiaomi Black Shark 2 ProXiaomi Black Shark 3Xiaomi Black Shark 3 ProXiaomi Black Shark 3SXiaomi Black Shark 4Xiaomi Black Shark 4 ProXiaomi Black Shark 5 ProXiaomi Black Shark 5 RSXiaomi Black Shark HeloDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.