FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Xiaomi 12S Ultra vs BLU G90 Pro
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Xiaomi 12S Ultra on one side and the BLU G90 Pro on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 3.2GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.1GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Xiaomi 12S Ultra | BLU G90 Pro | ||||||
| Model version(s) | 2203121C, Mi 12S Ultra |
G0310WW, G90 Pro |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2022 | Q3 2020 | ||||||
| Network | 5G, CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,43 x 2,95 x 0,36 in | 6,38 x 3,03 x 0,40 in | ||||||
| Weight | 7.94 oz | 7.58 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, aluminum frame, leather back |
Front glass, plastic body |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.7 inches, 1000 nits, 1B colours | 6.5 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | LTPO2 AMOLED, 120Hz | IPS LCD | ||||||
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels | 1080 x 2340 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 | ||||||
| Density | 521 ppi | 396 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 12; MIUI 13 | Android 10 | ||||||
| Processor | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | MediaTek MT6785T Helio G90T | ||||||
| Lithography | 4 nm N4 | 12 nm HPM | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x Qualcomm Kryo Silver @ 2.0 GHz |
6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | 1x Qualcomm Kryo Prime @ 3.2 GHz, 3x Qualcomm Kryo Gold @ 2.75 GHz |
2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.05 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 730 | ARM Mali-G76 MC4 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 3 | 4 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 768 | 64 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 900 MHz | 800 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 2,764.8 GFLOPS | 195.8 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 8 / 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 256 / 512 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | - | Up to 128 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 50,3 MP, f/1,9, 23mm, 48 MP, f/4,1, 120mm, 48 MP, f/2,2, 13mm |
48 MP, f/1,8, 8 MP, f/2,2, 2 MP, f/2,2, 2 MP, f/2,2 |
||||||
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@3840fps |
4K@30fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 32 MP, f/2,5, 26mm |
32 MP, f/2,0 |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 4.1, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 4,860 mAh | 5,100 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 14 hours and 50 minutes | ~ 11 hours | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 1,073,551 | 221,234 | ||||||
| Android PassMark Rating | 15,054 | 6,936 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 1,281 | 503 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 4,197 | 1,543 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi 12S Ultra is greater. The Xiaomi 12S Ultra has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Xiaomi 12S Ultra |
1,073,551 |
| BLU G90 Pro |
221,234 |
The difference is 385%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Android PassMark Rating | |
|---|---|
| Xiaomi 12S Ultra |
15,054 |
| BLU G90 Pro |
6,936 |
The difference in performance is 117%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Xiaomi 12S Ultra |
1,281 4,197 |
| BLU G90 Pro |
503 1,543 |
In single core, the difference is 155%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 172%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.