FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Xiaomi 11T vs Samsung Galaxy Note7 SD820
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Xiaomi 11T on one side and the Samsung Galaxy Note7 SD820 on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 3.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Smartphone | Xiaomi 11T | Samsung Galaxy Note7 SD820 | ||||||
| Model version(s) | 21081111RG | SM-N930A, SM-N930G, SM-N930P, SM-N930R4, SM-N930T, SM-N930V, SM-N930W8 |
||||||
| Release date | Q4 2021 | Q3 2016 | ||||||
| Network | 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE | CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,46 x 3,03 x 0,35 in | 6,04 x 2,91 x 0,31 in | ||||||
| Weight | 7.16 oz | 5.96 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, aluminum frame, glass back |
Front and back glass, aluminum frame |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.7 inches, 800 nits, 1B colours | 5.7 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | AMOLED, 120Hz | Super AMOLED | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 16:9 | ||||||
| Density | 395 ppi | 518 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 11; MIUI 12.5 | Android 6.0.1 | ||||||
| Processor | MediaTek MT6893Z_D/CZA Dimensity 1200-Ultra | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 | ||||||
| Lithography | 6 nm N6 | 14 nm | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz | 2x Qualcomm Kryo @ 1.6 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores | 1x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 3.0 GHz 3x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 2.6 GHz |
2x Qualcomm Kryo @ 2.15 GHz | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G77 MC9 | Qualcomm Adreno 530 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 9 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 144 | 256 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 850 MHz | 624 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 800.2 GFLOPS | 498.5 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 / 256 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | - | Up to 256 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 108 MP, f/1,8, 26mm, 8 MP, f/2,2, 5 MP, f/2,4, 50mm |
12 MP, f/1,7, 26mm | ||||||
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120 |
4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 720p@240fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 16 MP, f/2,5 | 5 MP, f/1,7, 22mm, 2 MP |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | ||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 3,500 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Ion | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 15 hours | ~ 16 hours | ||||||
| TDP | - | 7 W | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 439,910 | 141,881 | ||||||
| Android PassMark Rating | 10,703 | 1,926 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 4,275 | 1,382 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 13,334 | 3,480 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 804 | 229 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 2,819 | 850 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Xiaomi 11T has more cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi 11T is greater. The Xiaomi 11T has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Xiaomi 11T |
439,910 |
| Samsung Galaxy Note7 SD820 |
141,881 |
The difference is 210%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Android PassMark Rating | |
|---|---|
| Xiaomi 11T |
10,703 |
| Samsung Galaxy Note7 SD820 |
1,926 |
The difference in performance is 456%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Xiaomi 11T |
4,275 13,334 |
| Samsung Galaxy Note7 SD820 |
1,382 3,480 |
In single core, the difference is 209%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 283%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Xiaomi 11T |
804 2,819 |
| Samsung Galaxy Note7 SD820 |
229 850 |
In single core, the difference is 251%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 232%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NEXiaomi 11T ProDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.