Xiaomi 11T vs Motorola Moto Z
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Xiaomi 11T on one side and the Motorola Moto Z on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 3.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specifications:
Smartphone | |
Xiaomi 11T |
| | |
Motorola Moto Z |
| |
Model version(s) | |
21081111RG |
| | |
XT1650 |
| |
Release date | |
Q4 2021 |
| | |
Q3 2016 |
| |
Network | |
5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE |
| | |
CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE |
| |
Dimensions | |
6,46 x 3,03 x 0,35 in |
| | |
6,04 x 2,96 x 0,20 in |
| |
Weight | |
7.16 oz |
| | |
4.80 oz |
| |
Body | |
Front glass,
aluminum frame,
glass back |
| | |
Front glass,
aluminum body |
| |
Screen size, colours | |
6.7 inches, 800 nits, 1B colours |
| | |
5.5 inches, 16M colours |
| |
Screen type | |
AMOLED, 120Hz |
| | |
AMOLED |
| |
Resolution | |
1080 x 2400 pixels |
| | |
1440 x 2560 pixels |
| |
Screen ratio | |
20:9 |
| | |
16:9 |
| |
Density | |
395 ppi |
| | |
535 ppi |
| |
Operating system | |
Android 11; MIUI 12.5 |
| | |
Android 6.0.1 |
| |
Processor | |
MediaTek MT6893 Dimensity 1200 5G |
| | |
Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 |
| |
Lithography | |
6 nm N6 |
| | |
14 nm |
| |
Cores | |
8 |
| | |
4 |
| |
Threads | |
8 |
| | |
4 |
| |
Energy cores | |
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz |
| | |
2x Qualcomm Kryo @ 1.6 GHz |
| |
High performance cores | |
1x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 3.0 GHz
3x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 2.6 GHz |
| | |
2x Qualcomm Kryo @ 2.15 GHz |
| |
GPU integrated graphics | |
ARM Mali-G77 MC9 |
| | |
Qualcomm Adreno 530 |
| |
GPU execution units | |
9 |
| | |
2 |
| |
GPU shading units | |
144 |
| | |
256 |
| |
GPU clock | |
850 MHz |
| | |
624 MHz |
| |
GPU FP32 floating point | |
800.2 GFLOPS |
| | |
498.5 GFLOPS |
| |
Memory | |
8 GB RAM |
| | |
4 GB RAM |
| |
Storage | |
128 / 256 GB |
| | |
32 / 64 GB |
| |
Memory card | |
- |
| | |
Up to 256 GB |
| |
Photo | |
108 MP, f/1,8, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
5 MP, f/2,4, 50mm |
| | |
13 MP, f/1,8 |
| |
Video | |
4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60/120 |
| | |
4K@30fps,
1080p@60fps |
| |
Front photo | |
16 MP, f/2,5 |
| | |
5 MP, f/2,2 |
| |
Front video | |
1080p@30fps |
| | |
1080p@30fps |
| |
WLAN | |
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 |
| | |
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| |
Bluetooth | |
5.2, A2DP, LE |
| | |
4.1, A2DP, LE |
| |
USB | |
USB Type-C 2.0 |
| | |
USB Type-C |
| |
Battery capacity | |
5,000 mAh |
| | |
2,600 mAh |
| |
Battery type | |
Non removable Li-Po |
| | |
Non removable Li-Ion |
| |
Battery life (versatile use) | |
~ 15 hours |
| | |
~ 12 hours |
| |
TDP | |
- |
| | |
8 W |
| |
Head SAR | |
- |
| | |
- |
| |
Body SAR | |
- |
| | |
- |
| |
AnTuTu | |
439,910 |
| | |
58,807 |
| |
Android PassMark Rating | |
10,703 |
| | |
2,450 |
| |
(Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | |
4,275 |
| | |
1,390 |
| |
(Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | |
13,334 |
| | |
3,035 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 5 single core | |
804 |
| | |
298 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | |
2,819 |
| | |
743 |
| |
Amazon | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
eBay | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Xiaomi 11T has more cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi 11T is greater. The Xiaomi 11T has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.
The difference is 648%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
The difference in performance is 337%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 208%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 339%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
In single core, the difference is 170%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 279%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NEXiaomi 11T ProMotorola Moto E (2020)Motorola Moto E20Motorola Moto E4Motorola Moto E4 PlusMotorola Moto E40Motorola Moto E5Motorola Moto E5 PlusMotorola Moto E6Motorola Moto E6 PlayMotorola Moto E6 PlusMotorola Moto E6sMotorola Moto E6s (2020)Motorola Moto E7Motorola Moto E7 PlusMotorola Moto E7 PowerMotorola Moto E7i PowerMotorola Moto GMotorola Moto G 5GMotorola Moto G 5G PlusMotorola Moto G FastMotorola Moto G Play (2021)Motorola Moto G PowerMotorola Moto G Power (2021)Motorola Moto G Power (2022)Motorola Moto G ProMotorola Moto G PureMotorola Moto G StylusMotorola Moto G Stylus 5GMotorola Moto G10Motorola Moto G10 PowerMotorola Moto G100Motorola Moto G20Motorola Moto G22Motorola Moto G30Motorola Moto G31Motorola Moto G4Motorola Moto G4 PlayMotorola Moto G4 PlusMotorola Moto G40 FusionMotorola Moto G5Motorola Moto G5 PlusMotorola Moto G50Motorola Moto G50 5GMotorola Moto G51 5GMotorola Moto G5S PlusMotorola Moto G6Motorola Moto G6 PlayMotorola Moto G6 PlusMotorola Moto G60Motorola Moto G60sMotorola Moto G7Motorola Moto G7 OptimoMotorola Moto G7 Optimo MaxxMotorola Moto G7 PlayMotorola Moto G7 PlusMotorola Moto G7 PowerMotorola Moto G71 5GMotorola Moto G8Motorola Moto G8 PlayMotorola Moto G8 PlusMotorola Moto G8 PowerMotorola Moto G8 Power LiteMotorola Moto G9Motorola Moto G9 PlayMotorola Moto G9 PlusMotorola Moto G9 PowerMotorola Moto MMotorola Moto X4Motorola Moto Z2 ForceMotorola Moto Z2 PlayMotorola Moto Z3