Xiaomi 11T vs Google Pixel 3a

Xiaomi 11T on Amazon USA
Google Pixel 3a on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Xiaomi 11T on one side and the Google Pixel 3a on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 3.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.






Specifications:


Smartphone Xiaomi 11T Google Pixel 3a
Model version(s) 21081111RG G020A, G020E, G020B
Release date Q4 2021 Q3 2019
Network 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions 6,46 x 3,03 x 0,35 in 5,96 x 2,76 x 0,32 in
Weight 7.16 oz 5.19 oz
Body Front glass,
aluminum frame,
glass back
Front glass,
plastic body
Screen size, colours 6.7 inches, 800 nits, 1B colours 5.6 inches, 16M colours
Screen type AMOLED, 120Hz OLED
Resolution 1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2220 pixels
Screen ratio 20:9 18.5:9
Density 395 ppi 441 ppi
Operating system Android 11; MIUI 12.5 Android 9.0
Processor MediaTek MT6893 Dimensity 1200 5G Qualcomm SDM670 Snapdragon 670
Lithography 6 nm N6 10 nm LPP
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 8
Energy cores 4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz 6x Qualcomm Kryo 360 Silver @ 1.7 GHz
High performance cores 1x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 3.0 GHz
3x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 2.6 GHz
2x Qualcomm Kryo 360 Gold @ 2.0 GHz
GPU integrated graphics ARM Mali-G77 MC9 Qualcomm Adreno 615
GPU execution units 9 2
GPU shading units 144 128
GPU base clock 850 MHz -
GPU boost clock 850 MHz 700 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 800.2 GFLOPS 358.4 GFLOPS
Memory 8 GB RAM 4 GB RAM
Storage 128 / 256 GB 64 GB
Photo 108 MP, f/1,8, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
5 MP, f/2,4, 50mm
12,2 MP, f/1,8, 28mm
Video 4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60/120
4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps
Front photo 16 MP, f/2,5 8 MP, f/2,0, 24mm
Front video 1080p@30fps 1080p@30fps
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth 5.2, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
USB USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity 5,000 mAh 3,000 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 15 hours ~ 12 hours and 30 minutes
TDP - 5 W
Head SAR - -
Body SAR - -
DxOMark - 101
AnTuTu 439,910 157,937
Android PassMark Rating 10,703 5,344
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
4,275 1,610
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
13,334 5,079
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi 11T is greater. The Xiaomi 11T has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performances :


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.


AnTuTu - Total score
Xiaomi 11T 439,910
Google Pixel 3a 157,937


The difference is 179%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Xiaomi 11T 10,703
Google Pixel 3a 5,344


The difference in performance is 100%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Xiaomi 11T 4,275
13,334
Google Pixel 3a 1,610
5,079


In single core, the difference is 166%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 163%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

See also:

Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NEXiaomi 11T Pro

Google Pixel 3Google Pixel 3 XLGoogle Pixel 3a XL




GadgetVersus.com © 2022 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland