GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


Vivo Y7s vs Oppo Reno

Vivo Y7s on Amazon USA
Oppo Reno on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Vivo Y7s on one side and the Oppo Reno on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4, as well as an average price.

Specifications:


Smartphone Vivo Y7s Oppo Reno
Model version(s) 1907, V1907, 1907_19 CPH1917, PCAM00, PCAT00
Release date Q3 2019 Q2 2019
Dimensions 6,28 x 2,96 x 0,32 in 6,17 x 2,93 x 0,35 in
Weight 6.31 oz 6.53 oz
Body Front and back glass,
plastic frame
Front and back glass,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours 6.4 inches, 16M colours 6.4 inches, 16M colours
Screen type Super AMOLED AMOLED
Resolution 1080 x 2340 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Screen ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
Density 404 ppi 402 ppi
Operating system Android 9.0 Android 9.0; ColorOS 6
Processor MediaTek MT6768 Helio P65 Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710
Lithography 12 nm HPM 10 nm LPP
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 8
Energy cores 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.7 GHz 6x Kryo 360 Silver @ 1.7 GHz
High performance cores 2x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.0 GHz 2x Kryo 360 Gold @ 2.2 GHz
GPU ARM Mali-G52 MC2 Qualcomm Adreno 616
GPU execution units 2 2
GPU shading units 32 128
GPU clock rate 820 MHz 750 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 54.4 GFLOPS 384 GFLOPS
Memory 4 / 6 GB RAM 6 / 8 GB RAM
Storage 128 GB 128 / 256 GB
Memory card Up to 256 GB Up to 256 GB
Photo 16 MP, f/1,8,
8 MP, f/2,2, 13mm,
2 MP, f/2,4
48 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
5 MP, f/2,4
Video 1080p30 2160p30,
1080p30/60/120
Front photo 32 MP, f/2,0, 26mm 16 MP, f/2,0, 26mm
Front video 1080p30 1080p30
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth 5.0, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
USB Micro USB 2.0 Type-C 1.0
Battery capacity 4,500 mAh 3,765 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 16 hours and 40 minutes ~ 14 hours and 30 minutes
TDP - 11 W
Body SAR (US) - -
AnTuTu 146,560 166,940
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
1,839 1,601
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
5,979 5,823
(Multi-core / price performance)
Performance / price ratio
17 pts / $ 11 pts / $
Amazon Vivo Y7s Oppo Reno
(Average)
New price on Amazon
$360 $520
(Average)
Used price on Amazon
- -
eBay Vivo Y7s Oppo Reno
(Average)
New price on eBay
- -
(Average)
Used price on eBay
- -


We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Oppo Reno is larger. They were produced the same year.

Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Ratios: we first consider the average for the new price if available, the average for the used price otherwise.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.


AnTuTu - Total score
Oppo Reno 166,940
Vivo Y7s 146,560


The difference is 14%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Vivo Y7s 1,839
5,979
Oppo Reno 1,601
5,823


In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 3%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask EspaƱa W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland