Vivo V27 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Vivo V27 on one side and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.8GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Smartphone | |
Vivo V27 |
| | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 |
| |
Model version(s) | |
Vivo V2231, V2246
|
| | |
2016100
|
| |
Release date | |
Q1 2023 |
| | |
Q1 2017 |
| |
Network | |
5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE |
| | |
GSM, HSPA, LTE |
| |
Dimensions | |
6,46 x 2,94 x 0,29 in |
| | |
5,94 x 2,99 x 0,33 in |
| |
Weight | |
6.35 oz |
| | |
5.82 oz |
| |
Body | |
Front and back glass,
plastic frame |
| | |
Front glass,
aluminum body |
| |
Screen size, colours | |
6.8 inches, 1B colours |
| | |
5.5 inches, 16M colours |
| |
Screen type | |
AMOLED, 120Hz |
| | |
IPS LCD |
| |
Resolution | |
1080 x 2400 pixels |
| | |
1080 x 1920 pixels |
| |
Screen ratio | |
20:9 |
| | |
16:9 |
| |
Density | |
388 ppi |
| | |
401 ppi |
| |
Operating system | |
Android 13; Funtouch 13 |
| | |
Android 6; MIUI 11 |
| |
Processor | |
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 |
| | |
Qualcomm MSM8953 Snapdragon 625 |
| |
Lithography | |
4 nm N4P |
| | |
14 nm LPP |
| |
Cores | |
8 |
| | |
8 |
| |
Threads | |
8 |
| | |
8 |
| |
Energy cores | |
6x ARM Cortex-A510 @ 2.0 GHz
|
| | |
-
|
| |
High performance cores | |
2x ARM Cortex-A715 @ 2.8 GHz
|
| | |
8x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz
|
| |
GPU integrated graphics | |
ARM Mali-G610 MC4 |
| | |
Qualcomm Adreno 506 |
| |
GPU execution units | |
4 |
| | |
1 |
| |
GPU shading units | |
64 |
| | |
96 |
| |
GPU clock | |
600 MHz |
| | |
650 MHz |
| |
GPU FP32 floating point | |
610.6 GFLOPS |
| | |
124.8 GFLOPS |
| |
Memory | |
8 / 12 GB RAM |
| | |
3 / 4 GB RAM |
| |
Storage | |
128 / 256 GB |
| | |
32 / 64 GB |
| |
Memory card | |
- |
| | |
Up to 256 GB |
| |
Photo | |
50 MP, f/1,9,
8 MP, f/2,2, 16mm,
2 MP, f/2,4
|
| | |
13 MP, f/2,0
|
| |
Video | |
4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30fps
|
| | |
1080p@30fps,
720p@120fps
|
| |
Front photo | |
50 MP, f/2,5
|
| | |
5 MP, f/2,0
|
| |
Front video | |
4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30fps
|
| | |
1080p@30fps
|
| |
WLAN | |
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| | |
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n |
| |
Bluetooth | |
5.3, A2DP, LE |
| | |
4.1, A2DP, LE |
| |
USB | |
USB Type-C 2.0 |
| | |
microUSB 2.0 |
| |
Battery capacity | |
4,600 mAh |
| | |
4,100 mAh |
| |
Battery type | |
Non removable Li-Po |
| | |
Non removable Li-Po |
| |
Battery life (versatile use) | |
~ 13 hours and 30 minutes |
| | |
~ 9 hours and 10 minutes |
| |
AnTuTu | |
623,235 |
| | |
83,222 |
| |
Android PassMark Rating | |
9,583 |
| | |
3,070 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 4 single core | |
3,917 |
| | |
852 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | |
9,124 |
| | |
3,999 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 5 single core | |
894 |
| | |
167 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | |
2,380 |
| | |
927 |
| |
Amazon | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
eBay | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Vivo V27 is greater. The Vivo V27 has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
The difference is 649%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
The difference in performance is 212%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android:
In single core, the difference is 360%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 128%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
In single core, the difference is 435%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 157%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Vivo V20Vivo V20 ProVivo V20 SEVivo V21Vivo V21 5GVivo V21eVivo V21e 5GVivo V23 5GVivo V23 ProVivo V23eVivo V23e 5GVivo V25Vivo V25 ProVivo V25eVivo V27 ProVivo V27eXiaomi Redmi Note 10Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 10 LiteXiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro MaxXiaomi Redmi Note 10SXiaomi Redmi Note 10T 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4GXiaomi Redmi Note 11 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11 SEXiaomi Redmi Note 11EXiaomi Redmi Note 11E ProXiaomi Redmi Note 11SXiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11T 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11T ProXiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4GXiaomi Redmi Note 12 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 12 DiscoveryXiaomi Redmi Note 12 ExplorerXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro SpeedXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 12 TurboXiaomi Redmi Note 2Xiaomi Redmi Note 3Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek)Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (MediaTek)Xiaomi Redmi Note 4XXiaomi Redmi Note 5Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 5AXiaomi Redmi Note 6 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 7Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 7SXiaomi Redmi Note 8Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 8TXiaomi Redmi Note 9Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 9 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro MaxXiaomi Redmi Note 9SXiaomi Redmi Note 9T