Vivo V27 vs Ulefone Armor 5
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Vivo V27 on one side and the Ulefone Armor 5 on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.8GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Smartphone | |
Vivo V27 |
| | |
Ulefone Armor 5 |
| |
Model version(s) | |
Vivo V2231, V2246
|
| | |
Armor 5
|
| |
Release date | |
Q1 2023 |
| | |
Q3 2018 |
| |
Network | |
5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE |
| | |
CDMA, GSM, HSPA, LTE |
| |
Dimensions | |
6,46 x 2,94 x 0,29 in |
| | |
6,23 x 2,99 x 0,50 in |
| |
Weight | |
6.35 oz |
| | |
8.05 oz |
| |
Body | |
Front and back glass,
plastic frame |
| | |
Front glass,
aluminum body |
| |
Screen size, colours | |
6.8 inches, 1B colours |
| | |
5.9 inches, 16M colours |
| |
Screen type | |
AMOLED, 120Hz |
| | |
IPS LCD |
| |
Resolution | |
1080 x 2400 pixels |
| | |
720 x 1512 pixels |
| |
Screen ratio | |
20:9 |
| | |
19:9 |
| |
Density | |
388 ppi |
| | |
286 ppi |
| |
Operating system | |
Android 13; Funtouch 13 |
| | |
Android 8.1 Oreo |
| |
Processor | |
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 |
| | |
MediaTek MT6763V Helio P23 |
| |
Lithography | |
4 nm N4P |
| | |
16 nm FFC |
| |
Cores | |
8 |
| | |
8 |
| |
Threads | |
8 |
| | |
8 |
| |
Energy cores | |
6x ARM Cortex-A510 @ 2.0 GHz
|
| | |
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.5 GHz
|
| |
High performance cores | |
2x ARM Cortex-A715 @ 2.8 GHz
|
| | |
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz
|
| |
GPU integrated graphics | |
ARM Mali-G610 MC4 |
| | |
ARM Mali-G71 MP2 |
| |
GPU execution units | |
4 |
| | |
2 |
| |
GPU shading units | |
64 |
| | |
32 |
| |
GPU clock | |
600 MHz |
| | |
770 MHz |
| |
GPU FP32 floating point | |
610.6 GFLOPS |
| | |
49.3 GFLOPS |
| |
Memory | |
8 / 12 GB RAM |
| | |
4 GB RAM |
| |
Storage | |
128 / 256 GB |
| | |
64 GB |
| |
Memory card | |
- |
| | |
Up to 256 GB |
| |
Photo | |
50 MP, f/1,9,
8 MP, f/2,2, 16mm,
2 MP, f/2,4
|
| | |
16 MP,
5 MP
|
| |
Video | |
4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30fps
|
| | |
1080p@30fps
|
| |
Front photo | |
50 MP, f/2,5
|
| | |
13 MP
|
| |
Front video | |
4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30fps
|
| | |
720p@30fps
|
| |
WLAN | |
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| | |
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n |
| |
Bluetooth | |
5.3, A2DP, LE |
| | |
4.0, A2DP |
| |
USB | |
USB Type-C 2.0 |
| | |
USB Type-C 2.0 |
| |
Battery capacity | |
4,600 mAh |
| | |
5,000 mAh |
| |
Battery type | |
Non removable Li-Po |
| | |
Non removable Li-Po |
| |
Battery life (versatile use) | |
~ 13 hours and 30 minutes |
| | |
~ 10 hours |
| |
AnTuTu | |
623,235 |
| | |
102,972 |
| |
Android PassMark Rating | |
9,583 |
| | |
3,720 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 4 single core | |
3,917 |
| | |
834 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | |
9,124 |
| | |
3,576 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 5 single core | |
894 |
| | |
153 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | |
2,380 |
| | |
881 |
| |
Amazon | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
eBay | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Vivo V27 is greater. The Vivo V27 has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
The difference is 505%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
The difference in performance is 158%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android:
In single core, the difference is 370%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 155%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
In single core, the difference is 484%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 170%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Vivo V20Vivo V20 ProVivo V20 SEVivo V21Vivo V21 5GVivo V21eVivo V21e 5GVivo V23 5GVivo V23 ProVivo V23eVivo V23e 5GVivo V25Vivo V25 ProVivo V25eVivo V27 ProVivo V27eUlefone Armor 10 5GUlefone Armor 11 5GUlefone Armor 11T 5GUlefone Armor 12 5GUlefone Armor 15Ulefone Armor 17 ProUlefone Armor 2Ulefone Armor 2SUlefone Armor 3Ulefone Armor 3TUlefone Armor 3WUlefone Armor 3WTUlefone Armor 5SUlefone Armor 6EUlefone Armor 6SUlefone Armor 7Ulefone Armor 7EUlefone Armor 8Ulefone Armor 8 5GUlefone Armor 8 ProUlefone Armor 9Ulefone Armor 9EUlefone Armor Mini 2Ulefone Armor XUlefone Armor X10Ulefone Armor X10 ProUlefone Armor X2Ulefone Armor X3Ulefone Armor X5Ulefone Armor X5 ProUlefone Armor X6Ulefone Armor X6 ProUlefone Armor X7Ulefone Armor X7 ProUlefone Armor X8Ulefone Armor X8iUlefone Armor X9Ulefone Armor X9 Pro