Vivo V27 vs Samsung Galaxy S23
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Vivo V27 on one side and the Samsung Galaxy S23 on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.8GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.4GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Smartphone | |
Vivo V27 |
| | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 |
| |
Model version(s) | |
Vivo V2231, V2246
|
| | |
SM-S9110, SM-S911B, SM-S911B/DS,
SM-S911E, SM-S911E/DS, SM-S911N,
SM-S911U, SM-S911U1, SM-S911W
|
| |
Release date | |
Q1 2023 |
| | |
Q1 2023 |
| |
Network | |
5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE |
| | |
5G, CDMA, GSM, EVDO, HSPA, LTE |
| |
Dimensions | |
6,46 x 2,94 x 0,29 in |
| | |
5,76 x 2,79 x 0,30 in |
| |
Weight | |
6.35 oz |
| | |
5.93 oz |
| |
Body | |
Front and back glass,
plastic frame |
| | |
Front glass,
plastic back,
aluminum frame |
| |
Screen size, colours | |
6.8 inches, 1B colours |
| | |
6.1 inches, 1750 nits, 16M colours |
| |
Screen type | |
AMOLED, 120Hz |
| | |
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz |
| |
Resolution | |
1080 x 2400 pixels |
| | |
1080 x 2340 pixels |
| |
Screen ratio | |
20:9 |
| | |
19.5:9 |
| |
Density | |
388 ppi |
| | |
425 ppi |
| |
Operating system | |
Android 13; Funtouch 13 |
| | |
Android 13; One UI 5.1 |
| |
Processor | |
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 |
| | |
Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| |
Lithography | |
4 nm N4P |
| | |
4 nm N4 |
| |
Cores | |
8 |
| | |
8 |
| |
Threads | |
8 |
| | |
8 |
| |
Energy cores | |
6x ARM Cortex-A510 @ 2.0 GHz
|
| | |
3x Qualcomm Kryo Silver @ 2.0 Ghz
|
| |
High performance cores | |
2x ARM Cortex-A715 @ 2.8 GHz
|
| | |
1x Qualcomm Kryo Prime @ 3.36 GHz,
4x Qualcomm Kryo Gold @ 2.8 Ghz
|
| |
GPU integrated graphics | |
ARM Mali-G610 MC4 |
| | |
Qualcomm Adreno 740 |
| |
GPU execution units | |
4 |
| | |
5 |
| |
GPU shading units | |
64 |
| | |
1,024 |
| |
GPU clock | |
600 MHz |
| | |
719 MHz |
| |
GPU FP32 floating point | |
610.6 GFLOPS |
| | |
3,681.3 GFLOPS |
| |
Memory | |
8 / 12 GB RAM |
| | |
8 GB RAM |
| |
Storage | |
128 / 256 GB |
| | |
128 / 512 GB |
| |
Photo | |
50 MP, f/1,9,
8 MP, f/2,2, 16mm,
2 MP, f/2,4
|
| | |
50 MP, f/1,8, 24mm,
10 MP, f/2,4, 70mm,
12 MP, f/2,2, 13mm
|
| |
Video | |
4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30fps
|
| | |
8K@24/30fps,
4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60/240fps,
720p@960fps
|
| |
Front photo | |
50 MP, f/2,5
|
| | |
12 MP, f/2,2, 26mm
|
| |
Front video | |
4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30fps
|
| | |
4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30fps
|
| |
WLAN | |
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| | |
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e |
| |
Bluetooth | |
5.3, A2DP, LE |
| | |
5.3, A2DP, LE |
| |
USB | |
USB Type-C 2.0 |
| | |
USB Type-C 3.2 |
| |
Battery capacity | |
4,600 mAh |
| | |
3,900 mAh |
| |
Battery type | |
Non removable Li-Po |
| | |
Non removable Li-Ion |
| |
Battery life (versatile use) | |
~ 13 hours and 30 minutes |
| | |
~ 15 hours and 20 minutes |
| |
Head SAR | |
- |
| | |
- |
| |
Body SAR | |
- |
| | |
- |
| |
AnTuTu | |
623,235 |
| | |
1,204,657 |
| |
Android PassMark Rating | |
9,583 |
| | |
20,783 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 4 single core | |
3,917 |
| | |
8,046 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | |
9,124 |
| | |
20,083 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 5 single core | |
894 |
| | |
1,377 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | |
2,380 |
| | |
4,764 |
| |
Amazon | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
eBay | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Samsung Galaxy S23 is larger. They were produced the same year.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
The difference is 93%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
The difference in performance is 117%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android:
In single core, the difference is 105%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 120%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
In single core, the difference is 54%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 100%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Vivo V20Vivo V20 ProVivo V20 SEVivo V21Vivo V21 5GVivo V21eVivo V21e 5GVivo V23 5GVivo V23 ProVivo V23eVivo V23e 5GVivo V25Vivo V25 ProVivo V25eVivo V27 ProVivo V27eSamsung Galaxy S20 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20 5G SD865Samsung Galaxy S20 ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5GSamsung Galaxy S20 FE ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20 FE SD865Samsung Galaxy S20 SD865Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G SD865Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultra SD865Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20+ 5G SD865Samsung Galaxy S20+ ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20+ SD865Samsung Galaxy S21 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S21 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy S21 ExynosSamsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy S21 SD888Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S21+ 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy S22 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S22 5G SnapdragonSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G SnapdragonSamsung Galaxy S22+ 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S22+ 5G SnapdragonSamsung Galaxy S23 UltraSamsung Galaxy S23+