FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Vivo V27 vs Samsung Galaxy S22+ 5G Exynos
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Vivo V27 on one side and the Samsung Galaxy S22+ 5G Exynos on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.8GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.6GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Vivo V27 | Samsung Galaxy S22+ 5G Exynos | ||||||
| Model version(s) | Vivo V2231, V2246 |
SM-S906B, SM-S906B/DS, SM-S9060 |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2023 | Q1 2022 | ||||||
| Network | 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE | 5G, CDMA, GSM, EVDO, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,46 x 2,94 x 0,29 in | 6,20 x 2,98 x 0,30 in | ||||||
| Weight | 6.35 oz | 6.88 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front and back glass, plastic frame |
Front glass, plastic back, aluminum frame |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.8 inches, 1B colours | 6.6 inches, 1750 nits, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | AMOLED, 120Hz | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1080 x 2340 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 | ||||||
| Density | 388 ppi | 390 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 13; Funtouch 13 | Android 12; One UI 4.1 | ||||||
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | Samsung Exynos 2200 | ||||||
| Lithography | 4 nm N4P | 4 nm LPE | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 6x ARM Cortex-A510 @ 2.0 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A510 @ 1.73 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | 2x ARM Cortex-A715 @ 2.8 GHz |
1x ARM Cortex-X2 @ 2.59 GHz 3x ARM Cortex-A710 @ 2.5 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G610 MC4 | Samsung Xclipse 920 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 4 | 24 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 64 | 384 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 600 MHz | 555 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 610.6 GFLOPS | 1,278.7 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 8 / 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 / 256 GB | 128 / 256 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 50 MP, f/1,9, 8 MP, f/2,2, 16mm, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
50 MP, f/1,8, 24mm, 10 MP, f/2,4, 70mm, 12 MP, f/2,2, 13mm |
||||||
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 50 MP, f/2,5 |
10 MP, f/2,2, 26mm |
||||||
| Front video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 4,500 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Ion | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 13 hours and 30 minutes | ~ 13 hours and 30 minutes | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 623,235 | 823,229 | ||||||
| Android PassMark Rating | 9,583 | 13,716 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 single core | 3,917 | 5,718 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 9,124 | 14,686 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 894 | 1,140 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 2,380 | 3,213 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Vivo V27 is greater. The Vivo V27 has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy S22+ 5G Exynos |
823,229 |
| Vivo V27 |
623,235 |
The difference is 32%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Android PassMark Rating | |
|---|---|
| Samsung Galaxy S22+ 5G Exynos |
13,716 |
| Vivo V27 |
9,583 |
The difference in performance is 43%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Samsung Galaxy S22+ 5G Exynos |
5,718 14,686 |
| Vivo V27 |
3,917 9,124 |
In single core, the difference is 46%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 61%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Samsung Galaxy S22+ 5G Exynos |
1,140 3,213 |
| Vivo V27 |
894 2,380 |
In single core, the difference is 28%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 35%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Vivo V20Vivo V20 ProVivo V20 SEVivo V21Vivo V21 5GVivo V21eVivo V21e 5GVivo V23 5GVivo V23 ProVivo V23eVivo V23e 5GVivo V25Vivo V25 ProVivo V25eVivo V27 ProVivo V27eDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.