Vivo V27 vs Samsung Galaxy J4
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Vivo V27 on one side and the Samsung Galaxy J4 on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.8GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.4GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Smartphone | |
Vivo V27 |
| | |
Samsung Galaxy J4 |
| |
Model version(s) | |
Vivo V2231, V2246
|
| | |
SM-J400G, SM-J400F, SM-J400M
|
| |
Release date | |
Q1 2023 |
| | |
Q2 2018 |
| |
Network | |
5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE |
| | |
GSM, HSPA, LTE |
| |
Dimensions | |
6,46 x 2,94 x 0,29 in |
| | |
5,97 x 3,04 x 0,32 in |
| |
Weight | |
6.35 oz |
| | |
6.17 oz |
| |
Body | |
Front and back glass,
plastic frame |
| | |
Front glass
plastic body |
| |
Screen size, colours | |
6.8 inches, 1B colours |
| | |
5.5 inches, 16M colours |
| |
Screen type | |
AMOLED, 120Hz |
| | |
Super AMOLED |
| |
Resolution | |
1080 x 2400 pixels |
| | |
720 x 1280 pixels |
| |
Screen ratio | |
20:9 |
| | |
16:9 |
| |
Density | |
388 ppi |
| | |
267 ppi |
| |
Operating system | |
Android 13; Funtouch 13 |
| | |
Android 8 |
| |
Processor | |
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 |
| | |
Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 |
| |
Lithography | |
4 nm N4P |
| | |
14 nm LPP |
| |
Cores | |
8 |
| | |
4 |
| |
Threads | |
8 |
| | |
4 |
| |
Energy cores | |
6x ARM Cortex-A510 @ 2.0 GHz
|
| | |
-
|
| |
High performance cores | |
2x ARM Cortex-A715 @ 2.8 GHz
|
| | |
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.4 GHz
|
| |
GPU integrated graphics | |
ARM Mali-G610 MC4 |
| | |
ARM Mali-T720 MP2 |
| |
GPU execution units | |
4 |
| | |
2 |
| |
GPU shading units | |
64 |
| | |
32 |
| |
GPU clock | |
600 MHz |
| | |
830 MHz |
| |
GPU FP32 floating point | |
610.6 GFLOPS |
| | |
19.1 GFLOPS |
| |
Memory | |
8 / 12 GB RAM |
| | |
2 / 3 GB RAM |
| |
Storage | |
128 / 256 GB |
| | |
16 / 32 GB |
| |
Memory card | |
- |
| | |
Up to 256 GB |
| |
Photo | |
50 MP, f/1,9,
8 MP, f/2,2, 16mm,
2 MP, f/2,4
|
| | |
13 MP, f/1,9, 28mm
|
| |
Video | |
4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30fps
|
| | |
1080p@30fps
|
| |
Front photo | |
50 MP, f/2,5
|
| | |
5 MP, f/2,2
|
| |
Front video | |
4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30fps
|
| | |
-
|
| |
WLAN | |
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| | |
Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| |
Bluetooth | |
5.3, A2DP, LE |
| | |
4.2, A2DP |
| |
USB | |
USB Type-C 2.0 |
| | |
microUSB 2.0 |
| |
Battery capacity | |
4,600 mAh |
| | |
3,000 mAh |
| |
Battery type | |
Non removable Li-Po |
| | |
Non removable Li-Ion |
| |
Battery life (versatile use) | |
~ 13 hours and 30 minutes |
| | |
~ 7 hours |
| |
Head SAR | |
- |
| | |
- |
| |
Body SAR | |
- |
| | |
- |
| |
AnTuTu | |
623,235 |
| | |
56,098 |
| |
Android PassMark Rating | |
9,583 |
| | |
764 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 4 single core | |
3,917 |
| | |
594 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | |
9,124 |
| | |
1,697 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 5 single core | |
894 |
| | |
99 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | |
2,380 |
| | |
322 |
| |
Amazon | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
eBay | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Vivo V27 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Vivo V27 is greater. The Vivo V27 has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
The difference is 1011%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
The difference in performance is 1154%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android:
In single core, the difference is 559%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 438%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
In single core, the difference is 803%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 639%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Vivo V20Vivo V20 ProVivo V20 SEVivo V21Vivo V21 5GVivo V21eVivo V21e 5GVivo V23 5GVivo V23 ProVivo V23eVivo V23e 5GVivo V25Vivo V25 ProVivo V25eVivo V27 ProVivo V27eSamsung Galaxy J1Samsung Galaxy J1 AceSamsung Galaxy J2Samsung Galaxy J2 AceSamsung Galaxy J2 CoreSamsung Galaxy J2 Core (2020)Samsung Galaxy J2 PrimeSamsung Galaxy J2 ProSamsung Galaxy J3 (2016)Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) ExynosSamsung Galaxy J3 (2017)Samsung Galaxy J3 (2018)Samsung Galaxy J3 ProSamsung Galaxy J4+Samsung Galaxy J5Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017)Samsung Galaxy J5 PrimeSamsung Galaxy J5 ProSamsung Galaxy J6Samsung Galaxy J6+Samsung Galaxy J7Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016)Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)Samsung Galaxy J7 CoreSamsung Galaxy J7 CrownSamsung Galaxy J7 MaxSamsung Galaxy J7 NeoSamsung Galaxy J7 NxtSamsung Galaxy J7 PrimeSamsung Galaxy J7 ProSamsung Galaxy J7+Samsung Galaxy J8