Vivo V27 vs Huawei P9
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Vivo V27 on one side and the Huawei P9 on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.8GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.5GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Smartphone | |
Vivo V27 |
| | |
Huawei P9 |
| |
Model version(s) | |
Vivo V2231, V2246
|
| | |
EVA-AL00, EVA-AL10, EVA-DL00,
EVA-L09, EVA-L19, EVA-L29,
EVA-TL00
|
| |
Release date | |
Q1 2023 |
| | |
Q2 2016 |
| |
Network | |
5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE |
| | |
GSM, HSPA, LTE |
| |
Dimensions | |
6,46 x 2,94 x 0,29 in |
| | |
5,71 x 2,79 x 0,28 in |
| |
Weight | |
6.35 oz |
| | |
5.08 oz |
| |
Body | |
Front and back glass,
plastic frame |
| | |
Front glass,
aluminum body |
| |
Screen size, colours | |
6.8 inches, 1B colours |
| | |
5.2 inches, 16M colours |
| |
Screen type | |
AMOLED, 120Hz |
| | |
IPS-NEO LCD |
| |
Resolution | |
1080 x 2400 pixels |
| | |
1080 x 1920 pixels |
| |
Screen ratio | |
20:9 |
| | |
16:9 |
| |
Density | |
388 ppi |
| | |
423 ppi |
| |
Operating system | |
Android 13; Funtouch 13 |
| | |
Android 6 |
| |
Processor | |
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 |
| | |
HiSilicon Kirin 955 |
| |
Lithography | |
4 nm N4P |
| | |
16 nm FinFET+ |
| |
Cores | |
8 |
| | |
8 |
| |
Threads | |
8 |
| | |
8 |
| |
Energy cores | |
6x ARM Cortex-A510 @ 2.0 GHz
|
| | |
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.8 GHz
|
| |
High performance cores | |
2x ARM Cortex-A715 @ 2.8 GHz
|
| | |
4x ARM Cortex-A72 @ 2.5 GHz
|
| |
GPU integrated graphics | |
ARM Mali-G610 MC4 |
| | |
ARM Mali-T880 MP4 |
| |
GPU execution units | |
4 |
| | |
4 |
| |
GPU shading units | |
64 |
| | |
64 |
| |
GPU clock | |
600 MHz |
| | |
900 MHz |
| |
GPU FP32 floating point | |
610.6 GFLOPS |
| | |
122.4 GFLOPS |
| |
Memory | |
8 / 12 GB RAM |
| | |
3 / 4 GB RAM |
| |
Storage | |
128 / 256 GB |
| | |
32 / 64 GB |
| |
Memory card | |
- |
| | |
Up to 128 GB |
| |
Photo | |
50 MP, f/1,9,
8 MP, f/2,2, 16mm,
2 MP, f/2,4
|
| | |
12 MP, f/2,2, 27mm,
12 MP B/W, f/2,2, 27mm
|
| |
Video | |
4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30fps
|
| | |
1080p@30/60fps,
720p@120fps
|
| |
Front photo | |
50 MP, f/2,5
|
| | |
8 MP, f/2,4
|
| |
Front video | |
4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30fps
|
| | |
1080p@30fps
|
| |
WLAN | |
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| | |
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| |
Bluetooth | |
5.3, A2DP, LE |
| | |
4.2, A2DP, LE |
| |
USB | |
USB Type-C 2.0 |
| | |
USB Type-C |
| |
Battery capacity | |
4,600 mAh |
| | |
3,000 mAh |
| |
Battery type | |
Non removable Li-Po |
| | |
Non removable Li-Ion |
| |
Battery life (versatile use) | |
~ 13 hours and 30 minutes |
| | |
~ 7 hours |
| |
TDP | |
- |
| | |
5 W |
| |
Head SAR | |
- |
| | |
- |
| |
Body SAR | |
- |
| | |
- |
| |
DxOMark | |
- |
| | |
80 |
| |
AnTuTu | |
623,235 |
| | |
96,910 |
| |
Android PassMark Rating | |
9,583 |
| | |
4,181 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 4 single core | |
3,917 |
| | |
1,693 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | |
9,124 |
| | |
4,803 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 5 single core | |
894 |
| | |
355 |
| |
(Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | |
2,380 |
| | |
1,092 |
| |
Amazon | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
eBay | |
 |
| | |
 |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Vivo V27 is greater. The Vivo V27 has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
The difference is 543%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
The difference in performance is 129%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android:
|
Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android |
Vivo V27 |
3,917
9,124 |
Huawei P9 |
1,693
4,803 |
In single core, the difference is 131%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 90%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
|
Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android |
Vivo V27 |
894
2,380 |
Huawei P9 |
355
1,092 |
In single core, the difference is 152%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 118%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Vivo V20Vivo V20 ProVivo V20 SEVivo V21Vivo V21 5GVivo V21eVivo V21e 5GVivo V23 5GVivo V23 ProVivo V23eVivo V23e 5GVivo V25Vivo V25 ProVivo V25eVivo V27 ProVivo V27eHuawei P SmartHuawei P Smart 2019Huawei P Smart 2020Huawei P Smart 2021Huawei P Smart Pro 2019Huawei P Smart SHuawei P Smart ZHuawei P Smart+Huawei P Smart+ 2019Huawei P10Huawei P10 LiteHuawei P10 PlusHuawei P20Huawei P20 LiteHuawei P20 ProHuawei P30Huawei P30 LiteHuawei P30 Lite New EditionHuawei P30 ProHuawei P30 Pro New EditionHuawei P40Huawei P40 LiteHuawei P40 Lite 5GHuawei P40 Lite EHuawei P40 ProHuawei P40 Pro+Huawei P50Huawei P50 ProHuawei P50 Pro SD888Huawei P50 SD888Huawei P8Huawei P8 LiteHuawei P8 Lite (2017)Huawei P9 LiteHuawei P9 Lite 2017