FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Vivo V27 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Vivo V27 Pro on one side and the Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830 on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 3.1GHz. The second chips has a total of 1 cores, 1 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Vivo V27 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830 | ||||||
| Model version(s) | Vivo V2230 |
GT-S5830 |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2023 | Q1 2011 | ||||||
| Network | 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,46 x 2,94 x 0,29 in | 4,43 x 2,36 x 0,45 in | ||||||
| Weight | 6.42 oz | 3.99 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front and back glass, plastic frame |
Front glass, plastic body |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.8 inches, 1B colours | 3.5 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | AMOLED, 120Hz | TFT | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 320 x 480 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 3:2 | ||||||
| Density | 388 ppi | 165 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 13; Funtouch 13 | Android 2.3 (Gingerbread); TouchWiz UI 3 | ||||||
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Qualcomm MSM7227A Snapdragon S1 | ||||||
| Lithography | 4 nm N4 | 45 nm | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 1 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 1 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz |
- |
||||||
| High performance cores | 1x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 3.1 GHz, 3x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 3.0 GHz |
1x ARM Cortex-A5 @ 1 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G610 MC6 | Qualcomm Adreno 200 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 6 | 1 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 96 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 600 MHz | 245 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 950 MHz | 245 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 916 GFLOPS | 3.92 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 8 / 12 GB RAM | 158 MB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 / 256 GB | 278 MB | ||||||
| Memory card | - | Up to 32 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 50 MP, f/1,9, 8 MP, f/2,2, 16mm, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
5 MP, f/2,6 |
||||||
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
480p@24fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 50 MP, f/2,5 |
- |
||||||
| Front video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
- |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 2.1, A2DP | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 1,350 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Ion | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 15 hours and 30 minutes | ~ 7 hours | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 843,313 | 3,124 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 single core | 4,696 | 314 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 14,778 | 298 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Vivo V27 Pro has more cores, the maximum frequency of Vivo V27 Pro is greater. The Vivo V27 Pro has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Vivo V27 Pro |
843,313 |
| Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830 |
3,124 |
The difference is 26895%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
On Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Vivo V27 Pro |
4,696 14,778 |
| Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830 |
314 298 |
In single core, the difference is 1396%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 4859%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.