FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Vivo iQOO 9 Pro vs Itel A56
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Vivo iQOO 9 Pro on one side and the Itel A56 on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 3.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.3GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Smartphone | Vivo iQOO 9 Pro | Itel A56 | ||||||
| Model version(s) | I2022, V2172A |
Itel W6004 |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2022 | Q1 2020 | ||||||
| Network | 5G, CDMA, CDMA2000, GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,49 x 2,96 x 0,35 in | 6,29 x 3,06 x 0,35 in | ||||||
| Weight | 7.20 oz | 5.79 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front and back glass, aluminum frame |
Front glass, plastic body |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.8 inches, 500 nits, 1B colours | 6.0 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | LTPO2 AMOLED, 120Hz | LTPS IPS LCD, 60Hz | ||||||
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels | 480 x 960 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 18:9 | ||||||
| Density | 518 ppi | 242 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 12; Funtouch 12 | Android 9 Pie | ||||||
| Processor | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Unisoc SC7731E | ||||||
| Lithography | 4 nm 4LPE | 28 nm HPM | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x Qualcomm Kryo Silver @ 1.80 GHz |
- |
||||||
| High performance cores | 1x Qualcomm Kryo Prime @ 3.0 GHz, 3x Qualcomm Kryo Gold @ 2.5 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A7 @ 1.3 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 730 | ARM Mali-400 MP2 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 3 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 768 | 32 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 818 MHz | 200 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 818 MHz | 600 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 2,764.8 GFLOPS | 10.8 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 8 / 12 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 256 / 512 GB | 16 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | - | Up to 64 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 50 MP, f/1,8, 16 MP, f/2,2, 60mm, 50 MP, f/2,3, 15mm |
8 MP, 0,3 MP |
||||||
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
720@30fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 16 MP, f/2,5 |
5 MP |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
VGA |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 4.0, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,000 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Ion | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 12 hours and 30 minutes | ~ 9 hours | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 977 | 69 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 3,266 | 146 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Vivo iQOO 9 Pro has more cores, the maximum frequency of Vivo iQOO 9 Pro is greater. The Vivo iQOO 9 Pro has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
Vivo iQOO 9 Pro |
977 3,266 |
| Itel A56 |
69 146 |
In single core, the difference is 1316%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 2137%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.