Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro

Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro on one side and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.8GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneUlefone Power Armor 16 Pro Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
Model version(s)

Power Armor 16 Pro

M1806E7TG,
M1806E7TH,
M1806E7TI
Release dateQ3 2022 Q3 2018
NetworkGSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,83 x 3,28 x 0,72 in 6,22 x 3,01 x 0,33 in
Weight14.29 oz 6.42 oz
BodyFront glass,
aluminum body
aluminum body
Screen size, colours5.9 inches, 16M colours 6.3 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeIPS LCD IPS LCD
Resolution720 x 1440 pixels 1080 x 2280 pixels
Screen ratio18:9 19:9
Density271 ppi 403 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 12 Android 8.1
ProcessorMediaTek MT6762G Helio G25 Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636
Lithography12 nm FFC 14 nm LPP
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

-

4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Silver @ 1.6 GHz
High performance cores

8x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz

4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Gold @ 1.8 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsImagination PowerVR GE8320 Qualcomm Adreno 509
GPU execution units2 1
GPU shading units64 128
GPU base clock650 MHz -
GPU boost clock650 MHz 720 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point41.6 GFLOPS 184.3 GFLOPS
Memory4 GB RAM 4 / 6 GB RAM
Storage64 GB 64 GB
Memory cardUp to 128 GB Up to 256 GB
Photo

16 MP, f/1,8,
2 MP, f/2,4

12 MP, f/1,9, 1/2,55", 1,4µm
5 MP, f/2,2, 1,12µm
Video

1080p@30fps

1080p@30fps
Front photo

8 MP, f/2,0

20 MP, f/2,0, 0,9µm
2 MP, f/2,2, 1,75µm
Front video

1080p@30fps

1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 microUSB 2.0
Battery capacity9,600 mAh 4,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 23 hours ~ 13 hours and 10 minutes
TDP- 6 W
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu110,483 116,660
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
785 1,330
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
3,153 4,651
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro is greater. The Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro 116,660
Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro 110,483


The difference is 6%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro 1,330
4,651
Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro 785
3,153


In single core, the difference is 69%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 48%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.






GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland