Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 3
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro on one side and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 6 cores, 6 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.8GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Smartphone | | Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro |
| | | Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 | | |
Model version(s) | |
Power Armor 16 Pro
| | | |
2015116, 2015161
| | |
Release date | | Q3 2022 |
| | | Q1 2016 | | |
Network | | GSM, HSPA, LTE |
| | | GSM, HSPA, LTE | | |
Dimensions | | 6,83 x 3,28 x 0,72 in |
| | | 5,91 x 2,99 x 0,34 in | | |
Weight | | 14.29 oz |
| | | 5.78 oz | | |
Body | | Front glass,
aluminum body |
| | | Front glass,
aluminum body | | |
Screen size, colours | | 5.9 inches, 16M colours |
| | | 5.5 inches, 16M colours | | |
Screen type | | IPS LCD |
| | | IPS LCD | | |
Resolution | | 720 x 1440 pixels |
| | | 1080 x 1920 pixels | | |
Screen ratio | | 18:9 |
| | | 16:9 | | |
Density | | 271 ppi |
| | | 403 ppi | | |
Operating system | | Android 12 |
| | | Android 5.1.1; MIUI 9.5 | | |
Processor | | MediaTek MT6762G Helio G25 |
| | | Qualcomm MSM8956 Snapdragon 650 | | |
Lithography | | 12 nm FFC |
| | | 28 nm HPM | | |
Cores | | 8 |
| | | 6 | | |
Threads | | 8 |
| | | 6 | | |
Energy cores | | -
|
| | | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.4 GHz
| | |
High performance cores | | 8x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz
|
| | | 2x ARM Cortex-A72 @ 1.8 GHz
| | |
GPU integrated graphics | | Imagination PowerVR GE8320 |
| | | Qualcomm Adreno 510 | | |
GPU execution units | | 2 |
| | | 1 | | |
GPU shading units | | 64 |
| | | 128 | | |
GPU clock | | 650 MHz |
| | | 600 MHz | | |
GPU FP32 floating point | | 41.6 GFLOPS |
| | | 153.6 GFLOPS | | |
Memory | | 4 GB RAM |
| | | 2 / 3 GB RAM | | |
Storage | | 64 GB |
| | | 16 / 32 GB | | |
Memory card | | Up to 128 GB |
| | | Up to 128 GB |
| |
Photo | | 16 MP, f/1,8,
2 MP, f/2,4
|
| | | 16 MP, f/2,0
|
| |
Video | | 1080p@30fps
|
| | | 1080p@30fps
| | |
Front photo | | 8 MP, f/2,0
|
| | | 5 MP, f/2,0
|
| |
Front video | | 1080p@30fps
|
| | | 1080p@30fps
| | |
WLAN | | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| | | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | | |
Bluetooth | | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| | | 4.1, A2DP, LE | | |
USB | | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| | | microUSB 2.0 | | |
Battery capacity | | 9,600 mAh |
| | | 4,050 mAh | | |
Battery type | | Non removable Li-Po |
| | | Non removable Li-Po | | |
Battery life (versatile use) | | ~ 23 hours |
| | | ~ 15 hours and 40 minutes | | |
Head SAR | | - |
| | | - | | |
Body SAR | | - |
| | | - | | |
AnTuTu | | 110,483 |
| | | 50,121 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 4 single core | | 785 |
| | | 1,428 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | | 3,153 |
| | | 3,138 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 5 single core | | 162 |
| | | 266 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | | 782 |
| | | 681 | | |
Amazon | |  |
| | |  |
| |
eBay | |  |
| | |  |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro has more cores, the maximum frequency of Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro is greater. The Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
The difference is 120%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
With Android:In single core, the difference is -45%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 0%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
With Android:In single core, the difference is -39%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 15%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 10 LiteXiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro MaxXiaomi Redmi Note 10SXiaomi Redmi Note 10T 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4GXiaomi Redmi Note 11 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11 SEXiaomi Redmi Note 11EXiaomi Redmi Note 11E ProXiaomi Redmi Note 11SXiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11T 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11T ProXiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4GXiaomi Redmi Note 12 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 12 DiscoveryXiaomi Redmi Note 12 ExplorerXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4GXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro SpeedXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 12 TurboXiaomi Redmi Note 12R ProXiaomi Redmi Note 12SXiaomi Redmi Note 12T ProXiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 13 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+Xiaomi Redmi Note 2Xiaomi Redmi Note 2 PrimeXiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek)Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 4Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (MediaTek)Xiaomi Redmi Note 4XXiaomi Redmi Note 5Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 5AXiaomi Redmi Note 6 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 7Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 7SXiaomi Redmi Note 8Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 8TXiaomi Redmi Note 9Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 9 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro MaxXiaomi Redmi Note 9SXiaomi Redmi Note 9T