FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek)
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro on one side and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) | ||||||
| Model version(s) | Power Armor 16 Pro | Redmi Note 3 (Mediatek) | ||||||
| Release date | Q3 2022 | Q4 2015 | ||||||
| Network | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,83 x 3,28 x 0,72 in | 5,91 x 2,99 x 0,34 in | ||||||
| Weight | 14.29 oz | 5.78 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, aluminum body |
Front glass, aluminum body | ||||||
| Screen size, colours | 5.9 inches, 16M colours | 5.5 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | ||||||
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 18:9 | 16:9 | ||||||
| Density | 271 ppi | 403 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 12 | Android 5.0.2; MIUI 7 | ||||||
| Processor | MediaTek MT6762G Helio G25 | MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm FFC | 20 nm HPM | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| High performance cores | 8x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz |
8x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Imagination PowerVR GE8320 | Imagination PowerVR G6200 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 64 | 32 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 650 MHz | 700 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 41.6 GFLOPS | 76.8 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 4 GB RAM | 2 / 3 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 64 GB | 16 / 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 128 GB | Up to 128 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 16 MP, f/1,8, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
13 MP, f/2,2 |
||||||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
1080p@30fps | ||||||
| Front photo | 8 MP, f/2,0 |
5 MP, f/2,0 |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
1080p@30fps | ||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.1, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 9,600 mAh | 4,000 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 23 hours | ~ 13 hours and 20 minutes | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 110,483 | 46,972 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 single core | 785 | 752 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 3,153 | 2,762 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, they have an identical turbo frequency. The Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total Score | |
|---|---|
Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro | 110,483 |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) | 46,972 |
The difference is 135%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
With Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro |
785 3,153 |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) |
752 2,762 |
In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 14%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.