FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Ulefone Power Armor 14 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Ulefone Power Armor 14 on one side and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.3GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.3GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Ulefone Power Armor 14 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max | ||||||
| Model version(s) | Power Armor 14 |
M2003J6B1I |
||||||
| Release date | Q4 2021 | Q1 2020 | ||||||
| Network | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,91 x 3,25 x 0,68 in | 6,53 x 3,02 x 0,35 in | ||||||
| Weight | 12.63 oz | 7.37 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, aluminum body |
Front and back glass, plastic frame |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.5 inches, 16M colours | 6.7 inches, 450 nits, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | ||||||
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 | ||||||
| Density | 269 ppi | 395 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 11 | Android 10 | ||||||
| Processor | MediaTek MT6765G Helio G35 | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm FFC | 8 nm LPP | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | - |
6x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Silver @ 1.8 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | 8x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.3 GHz |
2x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Gold @ 2.3 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Imagination PowerVR GE8320 | Qualcomm Adreno 618 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 64 | 128 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 650 MHz | 750 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 41.6 GFLOPS | 435.2 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 4 GB RAM | 4 / 8 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 64 GB | 64 / 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 256 GB | Up to 512 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 20 MP, f/1,8, 26mm, 2 MP, f/2,8, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
48 MP, f/1,8, 8 MP, f/2,2, 13mm, 5 MP, f/2,4, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
||||||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 16 MP, f/2,2 |
32 MP |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | 5,020 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 25 hours | ~ 17 hours | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 109,128 | 273,702 | ||||||
| Android PassMark Rating | 3,245 | 6,091 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, they have an identical turbo frequency. The Ulefone Power Armor 14 has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max |
273,702 |
| Ulefone Power Armor 14 |
109,128 |
The difference is 151%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Android PassMark Rating | |
|---|---|
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Max |
6,091 |
| Ulefone Power Armor 14 |
3,245 |
The difference in performance is 88%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
See also:
Ulefone Power Armor 13Ulefone Power Armor 14 ProUlefone Power Armor 16 ProUlefone Power Armor 18Ulefone Power Armor 18TUlefone Power Armor 19Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.