FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Ulefone Armor 3T vs Razer Phone
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Ulefone Armor 3T on one side and the Razer Phone on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.5GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.5GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Ulefone Armor 3T | Razer Phone | ||||||
| Model version(s) | Armor 3T, Armor_3T |
Phone |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2019 | Q4 2017 | ||||||
| Network | CDMA, GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,49 x 3,12 x 0,72 in | 6,24 x 3,06 x 0,31 in | ||||||
| Weight | 12.84 oz | 6.95 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, aluminum body |
aluminum body | ||||||
| Screen size, colours | 5.7 inches, 16M colours | 5.7 inches, 380 nits, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | IPS LCD | IGZO IPS LCD, 120Hz | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 18:9 | 16:9 | ||||||
| Density | 424 ppi | 515 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 7.1.1 | ||||||
| Processor | MediaTek MT6763T Helio P23 | Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 | ||||||
| Lithography | 16 nm FFC | 10 nm FinFET LPE | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.65 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.9 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.5 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2.45 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G71 MP2 | Qualcomm Adreno 540 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 32 | 256 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 770 MHz | 670 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 770 MHz | 710 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 49.3 GFLOPS | 737 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 64 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 256 GB | Up to 1,000 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 21 MP, f/1,8 |
12 MP, f/1,8, 25mm, 12 MP, f/2,6 |
||||||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
4K@30fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 13 MP |
8 MP, f/2,0 |
||||||
| Front video | 720p@30fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.2, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 10,300 mAh | 4,000 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 19 hours | ~ 9 hours and 40 minutes | ||||||
| TDP | - | 9 W | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 94,557 | 206,933 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 single core | 920 | 1,923 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 4,241 | 6,581 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Ulefone Armor 3T is greater. The Ulefone Armor 3T has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Razer Phone |
206,933 |
| Ulefone Armor 3T |
94,557 |
The difference is 119%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
On Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Razer Phone |
1,923 6,581 |
| Ulefone Armor 3T |
920 4,241 |
In single core, the difference is 109%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 55%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
See also:
Ulefone Armor 3Ulefone Armor 3WUlefone Armor 3WTRazer Phone 2
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.