FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Ulefone Armor 3T vs Google Pixel 6a
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Ulefone Armor 3T on one side and the Google Pixel 6a on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.5GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.8GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Ulefone Armor 3T | Google Pixel 6a | ||||||
| Model version(s) | Armor 3T, Armor_3T |
G1AZG, GB62Z, GX7AS |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2019 | Q3 2022 | ||||||
| Network | CDMA, GSM, HSPA, LTE | 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,49 x 3,12 x 0,72 in | 5,99 x 2,83 x 0,35 in | ||||||
| Weight | 12.84 oz | 6.28 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, aluminum body |
Front glass, aluminum frame, plastic back |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 5.7 inches, 16M colours | 6.1 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | IPS LCD | OLED | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 18:9 | 20:9 | ||||||
| Density | 424 ppi | 429 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 12 | ||||||
| Processor | MediaTek MT6763T Helio P23 | Google Tensor | ||||||
| Lithography | 16 nm FFC | 5 nm LPE | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.65 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.8 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.5 GHz |
2x ARM Cortex-X1 @ 2.80 GHz 2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.25 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G71 MP2 | ARM Mali-G78 MP20 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 20 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 32 | 320 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 770 MHz | 848 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 49.3 GFLOPS | 1,943 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 64 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 256 GB | - | ||||||
| Photo | 21 MP, f/1,8 |
12,2 MP, f/1,7, 27mm, 12 MP, f/2,2, 17mm |
||||||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 13 MP |
8 MP, f/2,0, 24mm |
||||||
| Front video | 720p@30fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 5.2, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 10,300 mAh | 4,410 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 19 hours | ~ 24 hours | ||||||
| TDP | - | 9 W | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 94,557 | 732,389 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 169 | 1,054 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 997 | 2,933 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Google Pixel 6a is larger. The Google Pixel 6a was started more recently.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Google Pixel 6a |
732,389 |
| Ulefone Armor 3T |
94,557 |
The difference is 675%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Google Pixel 6a |
1,054 2,933 |
| Ulefone Armor 3T |
169 997 |
In single core, the difference is 524%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 194%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Ulefone Armor 3Ulefone Armor 3WUlefone Armor 3WTGoogle Pixel 6Google Pixel 6 Pro
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.