FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Ulefone Armor 2S vs Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Ulefone Armor 2S on one side and the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 on the other. The first has a processor with 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximale frequency of 1.5GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.8GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Ulefone Armor 2S | Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | ||||||
| Model version(s) | Armor 2S, Armor_2S |
Xiaomi Poco F1, M1805E10A |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2018 | Q3 2018 | ||||||
| Network | CDMA, GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,26 x 3,08 x 0,57 in | 6,12 x 2,96 x 0,35 in | ||||||
| Weight | 9.52 oz | 6.42 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, aluminum body |
Front glass, plastic body |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 5.0 inches, 16M colours | 6.2 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels | 1080 x 2246 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 16:9 | 18.7:9 | ||||||
| Density | 441 ppi | 403 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 7 (Nougat) | Android 8.1 | ||||||
| Processor | MediaTek MT6737T | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 | ||||||
| Lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm FinFET LPP | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | - |
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.9 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.5 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.8 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-T880 MP2 | Qualcomm Adreno 630 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 32 | 256 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 600 MHz | 710 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 57.6 GFLOPS | 737 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 6 GB RAM | 6 / 8 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 64 GB | 64 / 256 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 256 GB | Up to 256 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 16 MP, f/2,0 |
12 MP, f/1,9, 1/2,55", 1,4µm, 5 MP, f/2,0, 1,12µm |
||||||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 720p@960fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 5 MP, f/2,0 |
20 MP, f/2,0, 0,9µm |
||||||
| Front video | 720p@30fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,000 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 14 hours | ~ 13 hours and 40 minutes | ||||||
| TDP | - | 9 W | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 67,376 | 331,506 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 single core | 585 | 2,149 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 1,658 | 7,603 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is larger. They were produced the same year.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 |
331,506 |
| Ulefone Armor 2S |
67,376 |
The difference is 392%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
On Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Xiaomi Pocophone F1 |
2,149 7,603 |
| Ulefone Armor 2S |
585 1,658 |
In single core, the difference is 267%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 359%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
See also:
Ulefone Armor 2Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.