FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
TCL 10 SE vs BQ Mobile BQ-6424L Magic O
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the TCL 10 SE on one side and the BQ Mobile BQ-6424L Magic O on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Smartphone | TCL 10 SE | BQ Mobile BQ-6424L Magic O | ||||||
| Model version(s) | T766H, T766H_TR, T766H_EEA, T766J, T766U, T766U_EEA |
BQ-6424L Magic O, BQru_BQ-6424L | ||||||
| Release date | Q3 2020 | Q1 2020 | ||||||
| Network | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,49 x 2,94 x 0,33 in | 6,26 x 2,96 x 0,35 in | ||||||
| Weight | 5.86 oz | 6.31 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front and back glass, aluminum frame |
Front glass, plastic body |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.5 inches, 16M colours | 6.4 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | LCD | IPS LCD | ||||||
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels | 720 x 1560 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 | ||||||
| Density | 269 ppi | 271 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 10; TCL UI | Android 9.0 | ||||||
| Processor | MediaTek MT6762 Helio P22 | MediaTek MT6763V Helio P23 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm | 16 nm FFC | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | - | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.5 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores | 8x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Imagination PowerVR GE8320 | ARM Mali-G71 MP2 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 64 | 32 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 650 MHz | 770 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 41.6 GFLOPS | 49.3 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 128 GB | Up to 128 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 48 MP, f/1,8, 26mm, 5 MP, f/2,2, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
13 MP, f/2,0, 2 MP, 0,3 MP |
||||||
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps | ||||||
| Front photo | 8 MP, f/2,0, 26mm | 5 MP | ||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps | 480p@30fps | ||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 3,900 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 10 hours and 30 minutes | ~ 11 hours | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 103,143 | 78,036 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 823 | 831 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 3,744 | 3,567 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 149 | 157 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 868 | 822 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, they have an identical turbo frequency. They were produced the same year.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
TCL 10 SE |
103,143 |
| BQ Mobile BQ-6424L Magic O |
78,036 |
The difference is 32%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| TCL 10 SE |
823 3,744 |
| BQ Mobile BQ-6424L Magic O |
831 3,567 |
In single core, the difference is -1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 5%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| TCL 10 SE |
149 868 |
| BQ Mobile BQ-6424L Magic O |
157 822 |
In single core, the difference is -5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 6%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.