Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs Cubot X30

Sharp Aquos R2 Compact on Amazon USA
Cubot X30 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact on one side and the Cubot X30 on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.8GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.

Specification comparison:

Smartphone Sharp Aquos R2 Compact Cubot X30
Model version(s)

707SH, SH-M09

Release date Q1 2019 Q2 2020
Dimensions 5,16 x 2,52 x 0,37 in 6,18 x 3,01 x 0,33 in
Weight 4.76 oz 7.47 oz
Body Front glass,
plastic back,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
plastic body
Screen size, colours 5.2 inches, 16M colours 6.4 inches, 16M colours
Screen type IGZO IPS LCD, 120Hz IPS LCD
Resolution 1080 x 2280 pixels 1080 x 2310 pixels
Screen ratio 19:9 19:9
Density 485 ppi 398 ppi
Operating system Android 9.0 Android 10
Processor Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 MediaTek MT6771V Helio P60
Lithography 10 nm FinFET LPP 12 nm HPM
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 8
Energy cores

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.9 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz
High performance cores

4x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.8 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2.0 GHz
GPU integrated graphics Qualcomm Adreno 630 ARM Mali-G72 MP3
GPU execution units 2 3
GPU shading units 256 48
GPU clock 710 MHz 800 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 737 GFLOPS 86.4 GFLOPS
Memory 4 GB RAM 6 / 8 GB RAM
Storage 64 GB 128 / 256 GB
Memory card Up to 512 GB Up to 256 GB

22,6 MP, f/1,9, 22 mm

48 MP, f/2,2
16 MP,
5 MP,
2 MP


Front photo

8 MP, f/2,2, 23 mm

32 MP
Front video


WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n
Bluetooth 5.0, AD2P, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
USB USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity 2,500 mAh 4,200 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Ion Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 9 hours and 30 minutes ~ 9 hours
AnTuTu 254,957 166,253
Android PassMark Rating 6,806 5,069
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,274 1,420
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
7,961 5,309
Geekbench 5 single core
166 295
Geekbench 5 multi-core
1,861 1,281

We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Sharp Aquos R2 Compact is greater. The Cubot X30 was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.

AnTuTu - Total score
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact 254,957
Cubot X30 166,253

The difference is 53%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

Android PassMark Rating
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact 6,806
Cubot X30 5,069

The difference in performance is 34%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact 2,274
Cubot X30 1,420

In single core, the difference is 60%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 50%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact 166
Cubot X30 295

In single core, the difference is -44%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 45%.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality. © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland