FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G SD865 vs Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G SD865 on one side and the Xiaomi Poco X4 GT on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.8GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.9GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G SD865 | Xiaomi Poco X4 GT | ||||||
| Model version(s) | SM-G9880, SM-G988U, SM-G988U1 |
22041216G |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2020 | Q2 2022 | ||||||
| Network | 5G, CDMA, GSM, HSPA, EVDO, LTE | 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,57 x 2,99 x 0,35 in | 6,44 x 2,93 x 0,35 in | ||||||
| Weight | 7.83 oz | 7.05 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front and back glass, aluminum frame |
Front glass, plastic back |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.9 inches, 1400 nits, 16M colours | 6.6 inches, 500 nits, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 144Hz | ||||||
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels | 1080 x 2460 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 20.5:9 | ||||||
| Density | 511 ppi | 407 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 10; One UI 2 | Android 12; MIUI 13 | ||||||
| Processor | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | ||||||
| Lithography | 7 nm N7P | 5 nm N5 | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Silver @ 1.8 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | 1x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Prime @ 2.84 GHz 3x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Gold @ 2.42 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 2.85 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | ARM Mali-G610 MC6 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 6 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 512 | 96 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 587 MHz | 600 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 1,250 GFLOPS | 916 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 12 / 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 / 512 GB | 128 / 256 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 1,000 GB | - | ||||||
| Photo | 108 MP, f/1,8, 26mm, Periscope 48 MP, f/3,5, 103mm, 12 MP, f/2,2, 13mm, 0,3 MP, TOF 3D, f/1,0 |
64 MP, f/1,9, 8 MP, f/2,2, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
||||||
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 40 MP, f/2,2, 26mm |
16 MP, f/2,5 |
||||||
| Front video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,080 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 12 hours | ~ 12 hours and 10 minutes | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 558,501 | 754,488 | ||||||
| Android PassMark Rating | 10,860 | 15,743 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 single core | 3,806 | 4,276 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 12,390 | 15,403 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 847 | 925 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 3,124 | 3,675 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Poco X4 GT is larger. The Xiaomi Poco X4 GT was started more recently.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT |
754,488 |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G SD865 |
558,501 |
The difference is 35%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Android PassMark Rating | |
|---|---|
| Xiaomi Poco X4 GT |
15,743 |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G SD865 |
10,860 |
The difference in performance is 45%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Xiaomi Poco X4 GT |
4,276 15,403 |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G SD865 |
3,806 12,390 |
In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 24%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Xiaomi Poco X4 GT |
925 3,675 |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G SD865 |
847 3,124 |
In single core, the difference is 9%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 18%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.