Samsung Galaxy S20+ Exynos vs Sony Xperia M2

Samsung Galaxy S20+ Exynos on Amazon USA
Sony Xperia M2 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Samsung Galaxy S20+ Exynos on one side and the Sony Xperia M2 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.7GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneSamsung Galaxy S20+ Exynos Sony Xperia M2
Model version(s)

SM-G985, SM-G985F, SM-G985F/DS

D2303, D2305, D2306
Release dateQ1 2020 Q2 2014
NetworkCDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,37 x 2,90 x 0,31 in 5,5 x 2,80 x 0,34 in
Weight6.63 oz 5.22 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front and back glass,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours6.7 inches, 16M colours 4.8 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeDynamic AMOLED, 120Hz TFT
Resolution1440 x 3200 pixels 540 x 960 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 16:9
Density525 ppi 229 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 10; One UI 2 Android 4.3 (Jelly Bean)
ProcessorSamsung Exynos 990 Qualcomm MSM8226 Snapdragon 400
Lithography7 nm LPP 28 nm LP
Cores8 4
Threads8 4
Energy cores

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.95 GHz

-
High performance cores

2x Samsung Exynos M5 @ 2.73 GHz
2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.4 GHz

2x ARM Cortex-A7 @ 1.2 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsARM Mali-G77 MP11 Qualcomm Adreno 305
GPU execution units11 1
GPU shading units176 24
GPU clock800 MHz 400 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point1,126 GFLOPS 21.6 GFLOPS
Memory12 GB RAM 1 GB RAM
Storage128 / 512 GB 8 GB
Memory cardUp to 1 TB Up to 32 GB
Photo

12 MP, f/1,8, 26mm,
64 MP, f/2,0,
12 MP, f/2,2, 13mm

8 MP, f/2,4
Video

8K@24fps,
4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60/240fps,
720p@960fps

1080p@30fps
Front photo

10 MP, f/2,2, 26mm

VGA
Front video

4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30fps

480p
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE 4.0, A2DP
USBUSB Type-C 3.2 microUSB 2.0
Battery capacity4,500 mAh 2,300 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use)~ 11 hours and 40 minutes ~ 11 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu507,853 17,236
Android PassMark Rating8,817 541
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
3,665 455
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
11,578 1,176
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
691 59
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
2,631 115
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Samsung Galaxy S20+ Exynos has more cores, the maximum frequency of Samsung Galaxy S20+ Exynos is greater. The Samsung Galaxy S20+ Exynos has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Exynos 507,853
Sony Xperia M2 17,236


The difference is 2846%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Exynos 8,817
Sony Xperia M2 541


The difference in performance is 1530%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Exynos 3,665
11,578
Sony Xperia M2 455
1,176


In single core, the difference is 705%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 885%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Exynos 691
2,631
Sony Xperia M2 59
115


In single core, the difference is 1071%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 2188%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



See also:

Sony Xperia MSony Xperia M4 AquaSony Xperia M5




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.