Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos vs Xiaomi Mi Max Prime

Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Mi Max Prime on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos on one side and the Xiaomi Mi Max Prime on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.9GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.8GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneSamsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos Xiaomi Mi Max Prime
Model version(s)

SM-N960F, SM-N960N, SM-N960X

2016001, 2016002, 2016007
Release dateQ4 2018 Q2 2016
NetworkCDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,37 x 3,01 x 0,35 in 6,81 x 3,48 x 0,30 in
Weight7.09 oz 7.16 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
aluminum body
Screen size, colours6.4 inches, 16M colours 6.4 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeSuper AMOLED IPS LCD
Resolution1440 x 2960 pixels 1080 x 1920 pixels
Screen ratio18.5:9 16:9
Density516 ppi 342 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 8.1 Android 6
ProcessorSamsung Exynos 9 Series 9810 Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652
Lithography10 nm LPE 28 nm HPM
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.9 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.4 GHz
High performance cores

4x Samsung Exynos M3 @ 2.9 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A72 @ 1.8 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsARM Mali-G72 MP18 Qualcomm Adreno 510
GPU execution units18 1
GPU shading units288 128
GPU clock572 MHz 600 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point370 GFLOPS 153.6 GFLOPS
Memory6 / 8 GB RAM 4 GB RAM
Storage128 / 512 GB 128 GB
Memory cardUp to 512 GB Up to 256 GB
Photo

12 MP, f/1,5-2,4, 26mm

16 MP, f/2,0
Video

4K@60fps,
1080p@240fps,
720p@960fps

4K@30fps,
1080p@30fps
Front photo

12 MP, f/2,4, 52mm

5 MP, f/2,0
Front video

1440p@30fps

1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE 4.2, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 3.1 microUSB 2.0
Battery capacity4,000 mAh 4,850 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Ion Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use)~ 12 hours and 10 minutes ~ 21 hours and 10 minutes
TDP8 W -
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
DxOMark103 -
AnTuTu320,567 83,103
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
3,430 1,370
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
8,657 3,693
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos is greater. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos 320,567
Xiaomi Mi Max Prime 83,103


The difference is 286%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos 3,430
8,657
Xiaomi Mi Max Prime 1,370
3,693


In single core, the difference is 150%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 134%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.






GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.