Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos vs Xiaomi Mi 5

Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Mi 5 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos on one side and the Xiaomi Mi 5 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.9GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneSamsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos Xiaomi Mi 5
Model version(s)

SM-N960F, SM-N960N, SM-N960X

MZB4783IN
Release dateQ4 2018 Q2 2016
NetworkCDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,37 x 3,01 x 0,35 in 5,69 x 2,72 x 0,29 in
Weight7.09 oz 4.90 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front and back glass,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours6.4 inches, 16M colours 5.2 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeSuper AMOLED IPS LCD
Resolution1440 x 2960 pixels 1080 x 1920 pixels
Screen ratio18.5:9 16:9
Density516 ppi 428 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 8.1 Android 6; MIUI 10
ProcessorSamsung Exynos 9 Series 9810 Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820
Lithography10 nm LPE 14 nm
Cores8 4
Threads8 4
Energy cores

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.9 GHz

2x Qualcomm Kryo @ 1.6 GHz
High performance cores

4x Samsung Exynos M3 @ 2.9 GHz

2x Qualcomm Kryo @ 2.15 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsARM Mali-G72 MP18 Qualcomm Adreno 530
GPU execution units18 2
GPU shading units288 256
GPU clock572 MHz 624 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point370 GFLOPS 498.5 GFLOPS
Memory6 / 8 GB RAM 3 / 4 GB RAM
Storage128 / 512 GB 32 / 128 GB
Memory cardUp to 512 GB -
Photo

12 MP, f/1,5-2,4, 26mm

16 MP, f/2,0
Video

4K@60fps,
1080p@240fps,
720p@960fps

4K@30fps,
1080p@30fps,
720p@120fps
Front photo

12 MP, f/2,4, 52mm

4 MP, f/2,0
Front video

1440p@30fps

1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE 4.2, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 3.1 USB Type-C
Battery capacity4,000 mAh 3,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Ion Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 12 hours and 10 minutes ~ 8 hours and 20 minutes
TDP8 W 9 W
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
DxOMark103 -
AnTuTu320,567 106,313
Android PassMark Rating5,739 3,149
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
3,430 1,528
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
8,657 3,567
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos has more cores, the maximum frequency of Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos is greater. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos 320,567
Xiaomi Mi 5 106,313


The difference is 202%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos 5,739
Xiaomi Mi 5 3,149


The difference in performance is 82%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos 3,430
8,657
Xiaomi Mi 5 1,528
3,567


In single core, the difference is 124%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 143%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.



See also:

Xiaomi Mi 10 5GXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5GXiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5GXiaomi Mi 10 UltraXiaomi Mi 10 Youth 5GXiaomi Mi 10i 5GXiaomi Mi 10SXiaomi Mi 10T 5GXiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5GXiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5GXiaomi Mi 11Xiaomi Mi 11 LiteXiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5GXiaomi Mi 11 ProXiaomi Mi 11 UltraXiaomi Mi 11i 5GXiaomi Mi 11XXiaomi Mi 11X ProXiaomi Mi 3Xiaomi Mi 4Xiaomi Mi 4cXiaomi Mi 5cXiaomi Mi 5sXiaomi Mi 5s PlusXiaomi Mi 5XXiaomi Mi 6Xiaomi Mi 6XXiaomi Mi 8Xiaomi Mi 8 LiteXiaomi Mi 8 ProXiaomi Mi 8 SEXiaomi Mi 9Xiaomi Mi 9 LiteXiaomi Mi 9 ProXiaomi Mi 9 Pro 5GXiaomi Mi 9 SEXiaomi Mi 9TXiaomi Mi 9T ProXiaomi Mi A1Xiaomi Mi A2Xiaomi Mi A2 LiteXiaomi Mi A3Xiaomi Mi A4Xiaomi Mi CC9Xiaomi Mi CC9 ProXiaomi Mi CC9eXiaomi Mi MaxXiaomi Mi Max 2Xiaomi Mi Max 3Xiaomi Mi Max PrimeXiaomi Mi MixXiaomi Mi Mix 2Xiaomi Mi Mix 2SXiaomi Mi Mix 3Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 5GXiaomi Mi Mix AlphaXiaomi Mi NoteXiaomi Mi Note 10Xiaomi Mi Note 10 LiteXiaomi Mi Note 10 ProXiaomi Mi Note 2Xiaomi Mi Note 3Xiaomi Mi Note ProXiaomi Mi Play




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.