Samsung Galaxy J6+ vs Razer Phone 2

Samsung Galaxy J6+ on Amazon USA
Razer Phone 2 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Samsung Galaxy J6+ on one side and the Razer Phone 2 on the other. The first has a processor with 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximale frequency of 1.4GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.8GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.


Smartphone Samsung Galaxy J6+ Razer Phone 2
Model version(s) SM-J610F, SM-J610FN, SM-J610G Phone 2
Release date Q4 2018 Q4 2018
Dimensions 6,35 x 3,03 x 0,31 in 6,24 x 3,11 x 0,33 in
Weight 6.28 oz 7.76 oz
Body Front glass,
plastic body
Front glass,
aluminum body
Screen size, colours 6.0 inches, 16M colours 5.7 inches, 580 nits, 16M colours
Screen type IPS LCD IGZO IPS LCD, 120Hz
Resolution 720 x 1480 pixels 1440 x 2560 pixels
Screen ratio 18.5:9 16:9
Density 274 ppi 513 ppi
Operating system Android 8.1; One UI Android 8.1
Processor Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845
Lithography 28 nm LP 10 nm FinFET LPP
Cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Energy cores - 4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.9 GHz
High performance cores 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.4 GHz 4x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.8 GHz
GPU integrated graphics Qualcomm Adreno 308 Qualcomm Adreno 630
GPU execution units 1 2
GPU shading units 24 256
GPU clock 500 MHz 710 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 24 GFLOPS 737 GFLOPS
Memory 3 / 4 GB RAM 8 GB RAM
Storage 32 / 64 GB 64 GB
Memory card Up to 512 GB Up to 1,000 GB
Photo 13 MP, f/1,9, 28mm,
5 MP, f/1,9
12 MP, f/1,8, 25mm,
12 MP, f/2,6
Video 1080p30 2160p30/60,
Front photo 8 MP, f/1,9 8 MP, f/2,0
Front video 1080p30 1080p30/60
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth 4.2, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
USB microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C
Battery capacity 3,300 mAh 4,000 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Ion Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 11 hours and 50 minutes ~ 8 hours
TDP 6 W 13 W
Head SAR - -
Body SAR - -
AnTuTu 34,981 240,871
Android PassMark Rating 680 7,850
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
611 2,382
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
1,660 8,705

We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Razer Phone 2 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Razer Phone 2 is larger. They were produced the same year.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.

AnTuTu - Total score
Razer Phone 2 240,871
Samsung Galaxy J6+ 34,981

The difference is 589%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

Android PassMark Rating
Razer Phone 2 7,850
Samsung Galaxy J6+ 680

The difference in performance is 1054%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Razer Phone 2 2,382
Samsung Galaxy J6+ 611

In single core, the difference is 290%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 424%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

See also:

Samsung Galaxy J6 © 2022 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland