GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


Samsung Galaxy Fold vs Apple iPhone 3GS

Samsung Galaxy Fold on Amazon USA
Apple iPhone 3GS on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Samsung Galaxy Fold on one side and the Apple iPhone 3GS on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.8GHz. The second chips has a total of 1 cores, 1 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 0.6GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4, as well as an average price.

Specifications:


Smartphone Samsung Galaxy Fold Apple iPhone 3GS
Model version(s) SM-F9000, SM-F900F, SM-F900N,
SM-F900U, SM-F900W
A1325
Release date Q2 2019 Q2 2009
Dimensions 6,51 x 4,75 x 0,55 in 4,55 x 2,44 x 0,48 in
Weight 0.00- 4.76 oz
Body Back glass,
Aluminum frame
Aluminum body
Screen size, colours 7.3 inches, 16M colours 3.5 inches, 16M colours
Screen type Dynamic AMOLED TFT
Resolution 1536 x 2152 pixels 320 x 480 pixels
Screen ratio 16:10 3:2
Density 414 ppi 165 ppi
Operating system Android 9.0 iOS 3
Processor Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 ARM Cortex-A8
Lithography 7 nm FinFET 65 nm
Cores 8 1
Threads 8 1
Energy cores 4x Kryo 485 Silver @ 1.8 GHz 1x ARM Cortex-A8 @ 600 MHz
High performance cores 1x Kryo 485 Gold Prime @ 2.84 GHz
3x Kryo 485 Gold @ 2.42 GHz
-
GPU Qualcomm Adreno 640 Imagination PowerVR SGX535
GPU execution units 2 2
GPU shading units 384 8
GPU clock rate 672 MHz 200 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 954.7 GFLOPS 1.6 GFLOPS
Memory 12 GB RAM 0.256 GB RAM
Storage 512 GB 8 / 32 GB
Photo 12 MP, f/1,5-2,4, 26mm
12 MP, f/2,4, 52mm
16 MP, f/2,2, 12mm
3,15 MP, AF, f/2,8
Video 2160p30/60 480p30
Front photo 10 MP, f/2,2
8 MP, f/1,9
Front video 1080p30
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g
Bluetooth 5.0, A2DP, LE 2.1, A2DP
USB Micro USB 3.1, Type-C 1.0 Micro USB 2.0
Battery capacity 4,380 mAh 1,220 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use) - ~ 8 hours
TDP - 3 W
Head SAR (US) - -
Body SAR (US) - -
DxOMark 109 -
(Android 64-bit | iOS 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
3,400 150
(Android 64-bit | iOS 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
9,474 150
(Multi-core / price performance)
Performance / price ratio
6 pts / $ 3 pts / $
Note - 3.4 / 5
Reviews - 365
Amazon Samsung Galaxy Fold Apple iPhone 3GS
(Average)
New price on Amazon
$1,700 -
(Average)
Used price on Amazon
- -
eBay Samsung Galaxy Fold Apple iPhone 3GS
(Average)
New price on eBay
- -
(Average)
Used price on eBay
- -


We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Samsung Galaxy Fold has more cores, the maximum frequency of Samsung Galaxy Fold is greater. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a newer release date.

Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Ratios: we first consider the average for the new price if available, the average for the used price otherwise.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.


Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit & iOS 64-bit
Samsung Galaxy Fold 3,400
9,474
Apple iPhone 3GS 150
150


In single core, the difference is 2167%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 6216%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask EspaƱa W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland