Samsung Galaxy A72 vs Samsung Galaxy S23
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Samsung Galaxy A72 on one side and the Samsung Galaxy S23 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.3GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.4GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Smartphone | | Samsung Galaxy A72 |
| | | Samsung Galaxy S23 | | |
Model version(s) | |
SM-A725F, SM-A725F/DS
| | | |
SM-S9110, SM-S911B, SM-S911B/DS,
SM-S911E, SM-S911E/DS, SM-S911N,
SM-S911U, SM-S911U1, SM-S911W
| | |
Release date | | Q1 2021 |
| | | Q1 2023 | | |
Network | | GSM, HSPA, LTE |
| | | 5G, CDMA, GSM, EVDO, HSPA, LTE | | |
Dimensions | | 6,50 x 3,05 x 0,33 in |
| | | 5,76 x 2,79 x 0,30 in | | |
Weight | | 7.16 oz |
| | | 5.93 oz | | |
Body | | Front glass,
plastic back,
aluminum frame |
| | | Front glass,
plastic back,
aluminum frame | | |
Screen size, colours | | 6.7 inches, 800 nits, 16M colours |
| | | 6.1 inches, 1750 nits, 16M colours | | |
Screen type | | Super AMOLED, 90Hz |
| | | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz | | |
Resolution | | 1080 x 2400 pixels |
| | | 1080 x 2340 pixels | | |
Screen ratio | | 20:9 |
| | | 19.5:9 | | |
Density | | 393 ppi |
| | | 425 ppi | | |
Operating system | | Android 11; One UI 3.1 |
| | | Android 13; One UI 5.1 | | |
Processor | | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| | | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | | |
Lithography | | 8 nm LPP |
| | | 4 nm N4 | | |
Cores | | 8 |
| | | 8 | | |
Threads | | 8 |
| | | 8 | | |
Energy cores | | 6x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Silver @ 1.8 GHz
|
| | | 3x Qualcomm Kryo Silver @ 2.0 Ghz
| | |
High performance cores | | 2x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Gold @ 2.3 GHz
|
| | | 1x Qualcomm Kryo Prime @ 3.36 GHz,
4x Qualcomm Kryo Gold @ 2.8 Ghz
| | |
GPU integrated graphics | | Qualcomm Adreno 618 |
| | | Qualcomm Adreno 740 | | |
GPU execution units | | 2 |
| | | 5 | | |
GPU shading units | | 128 |
| | | 1,280 | | |
GPU clock | | 750 MHz |
| | | 719 MHz | | |
GPU FP32 floating point | | 422.4 GFLOPS |
| | | 3,681.3 GFLOPS | | |
Memory | | 6 / 8 GB RAM |
| | | 8 GB RAM | | |
Storage | | 128 / 256 GB |
| | | 128 / 512 GB | | |
Memory card | | Up to 1 TB |
| | | - |
| |
Photo | | 64 MP, f/1,8, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,4,
12 MP, f/2,2,
5 MP, f/2,4
|
| | | 50 MP, f/1,8, 24mm,
10 MP, f/2,4, 70mm,
12 MP, f/2,2, 13mm
|
| |
Video | | 4K@30fps,
1080p@30/120fps
|
| | | 8K@24/30fps,
4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60/240fps,
720p@960fps
| | |
Front photo | | 32 MP, f/2,2, 26mm
|
| | | 12 MP, f/2,2, 26mm
|
| |
Front video | | 4K@30fps,
1080p@30fps
|
| | | 4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30fps
| | |
WLAN | | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| | | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e | | |
Bluetooth | | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| | | 5.3, A2DP, LE | | |
USB | | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| | | USB Type-C 3.2 | | |
Battery capacity | | 5,000 mAh |
| | | 3,900 mAh | | |
Battery type | | Non removable Li-Ion |
| | | Non removable Li-Ion | | |
Battery life (versatile use) | | ~ 15 hours |
| | | ~ 15 hours and 20 minutes | | |
Head SAR | | - |
| | | - | | |
Body SAR | | - |
| | | - | | |
AnTuTu | | 287,822 |
| | | 1,204,657 | | |
Android PassMark Rating | | 6,195 |
| | | 20,783 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 4 single core | | 2,480 |
| | | 8,046 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | | 6,502 |
| | | 20,083 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 5 single core | | 522 |
| | | 1,377 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | | 1,601 |
| | | 4,764 | | |
Amazon | |  |
| | |  |
| |
eBay | |  |
| | |  |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Samsung Galaxy S23 is larger. The Samsung Galaxy S23 was started more recently.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
The difference is 319%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
The difference in performance is 235%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
With Android:In single core, the difference is 224%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 209%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
With Android:In single core, the difference is 164%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 198%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)Samsung Galaxy A7 ExynosSamsung Galaxy A7 SD615Samsung Galaxy A70Samsung Galaxy A70sSamsung Galaxy A71Samsung Galaxy A71 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy A71 5G SD765GSamsung Galaxy A73 5GSamsung Galaxy S20 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20 5G SD865Samsung Galaxy S20 ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5GSamsung Galaxy S20 FE ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20 FE SD865Samsung Galaxy S20 SD865Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G SD865Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultra SD865Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20+ 5G SD865Samsung Galaxy S20+ ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20+ SD865Samsung Galaxy S21 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S21 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy S21 ExynosSamsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy S21 SD888Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S21+ 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy S22 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S22 5G SnapdragonSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G SnapdragonSamsung Galaxy S22+ 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S22+ 5G SnapdragonSamsung Galaxy S23 FE ExynosSamsung Galaxy S23 FE SnapdragonSamsung Galaxy S23 UltraSamsung Galaxy S23+