FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G on one side and the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.4GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.4GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G | Samsung Galaxy A73 5G | ||||||
| Model version(s) | SM-A5360, SM-A536BZKNEUB, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1 |
SM-A736B, SM-A736B/DS |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2022 | Q2 2022 | ||||||
| Network | 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE | 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,28 x 2,94 x 0,32 in | 6,44 x 3,00 x 0,30 in | ||||||
| Weight | 6.67 oz | 6.38 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, plastic back, aluminum frame |
Front glass, plastic back, aluminum frame |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.5 inches, 16M colours | 6.7 inches, 800 nits, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 | ||||||
| Density | 405 ppi | 393 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 12; One UI 4.1 | Android 12; One UI 4.1 | ||||||
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1280 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | ||||||
| Lithography | 5 nm LPE | 6 nm N6 | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz |
4x qualcomm Kryo 670 Silver @ 1.9 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | 2x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 2.4 GHz |
1x Qualcomm Kryo 670 Prime @ 2.4 GHz 3x Qualcomm Kryo 670 Gold @ 2.2 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G68 MC4 | Qualcomm Adreno 642L | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 4 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 64 | 384 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 800 MHz | 490 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1000 MHz | 490 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 486.4 GFLOPS | - | ||||||
| Memory | 6 / 8 GB RAM | 6 / 8 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 / 256 GB | 128 / 256 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 1,000 GB | Up to 1,000 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 64 MP, f/1,8, 26mm, 12 MP, f/2,2, 5 MP, f/2,4, 5 MP, f/2,4 |
108 MP, f/1,8, 12 MP, f/2,2, 5 MP, f/2,4, 5 MP, f/2,4 |
||||||
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 32 MP, f/2,2, 26mm |
32 MP, f/2,2, 26mm |
||||||
| Front video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Ion | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 15 hours | ~ 18 hours and 30 minutes | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 415,457 | 490,032 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 728 | 760 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 1,884 | 2,729 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, they have an identical turbo frequency. They were produced the same year.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G |
490,032 |
| Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
415,457 |
The difference is 18%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Samsung Galaxy A73 5G |
760 2,729 |
| Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
728 1,884 |
In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 45%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.