Samsung Galaxy A25 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A35 5G

Samsung Galaxy A25 5G on Amazon USA
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G on one side and the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.4GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.4GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.

Specification comparison:

SmartphoneSamsung Galaxy A25 5G Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Model version(s)

SM-A256B, SM-A256B/DS

SM-A356B, SM-A356B/DS,
SM-A356E, SM-A356E/DS,
Release dateQ4 2023 Q1 2024
Dimensions6,34 x 3,01 x 0,33 in 6,37 x 3,07 x 0,32 in
Weight6.95 oz 7.37 oz
BodyFront glass,
plastic body
Front glass,
plastic body
Screen size, colours6.5 inches, 1000 nits, 16M colours 6.6 inches, 1000 nits, 16M colours
Screen typeSuper AMOLED, 120Hz Super AMOLED, 120Hz
Resolution1080 x 2340 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Screen ratio19.5:9 19.5:9
Density396 ppi 390 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 14; One UI 6 Android 14; One UI 6.1
ProcessorSamsung Exynos 1280 Samsung Exynos 1380
Lithography5 nm LPE 5 nm LPE
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz

6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz
High performance cores

2x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 2.4 GHz

2x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 2.4 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsARM Mali-G68 MC4 ARM Mali-G68 MP5
GPU execution units4 5
GPU shading units64 80
GPU base clock800 MHz 800 MHz
GPU boost clock1000 MHz 950 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point486.4 GFLOPS 608 GFLOPS
Memory6 / 8 GB RAM 6 / 8 GB RAM
Storage128 / 256 GB 128 / 256 GB
Memory cardUp to 1 TB Up to 1 TB

50 MP, f/1,8,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4

50 MP, f/1,8,
8 MP, f/2,2,
5 MP, f/2,4


Front photo

13 MP, f/2,2

13 MP, f/2,2
Front video


WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE 5.3, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity5,000 mAh 5,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 21 hours ~ 15 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu464,986 518,356
Geekbench 4 single core
3,341 3,438
Geekbench 4 multi-core
7,536 11,187
Geekbench 5 single core
750 788
Geekbench 5 multi-core
2,032 2,733
Geekbench 6 single core
972 1,025
Geekbench 6 multi-core
2,089 2,998

We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, they have an identical turbo frequency. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.

AnTuTu - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 518,356
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G 464,986

The difference is 11%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 3,438
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G 3,341

In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 48%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 788
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G 750

In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 34%.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

With Android:

Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 1,025
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G 972

In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 44%.

Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads. © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.