Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Google Pixel 3a XL

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G on Amazon USA
Google Pixel 3a XL on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G on one side and the Google Pixel 3a XL on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.2GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.






Specifications:


Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Google Pixel 3a XL
Model version(s) SM-A225F, SM-A225F/DS G020C, G020G, G020F
Release date Q2 2021 Q3 2019
Network 5G GSM, HSPA, LTE CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions 6,58 x 3,01 x 0,35 in 6,30 x 3,00 x 0,32 in
Weight 7.16 oz 5.89 oz
Body Front glass,
plastic body
Front glass,
plastic body
Screen size, colours 6.6 inches, 16M colours 6.0 inches, 16M colours
Screen type TFT, 90Hz OLED
Resolution 1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2160 pixels
Screen ratio 20:9 18:9
Density 399 ppi 402 ppi
Operating system Android 11; One UI Core 3.1 Android 9.0
Processor MediaTek MT6833V Dimensity 700 5G Qualcomm SDM670 Snapdragon 670
Lithography 7 nm N7 10 nm LPP
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 8
Energy cores 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz 6x Qualcomm Kryo 360 Silver @ 1.7 GHz
High performance cores 2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz 2x Qualcomm Kryo 360 Gold @ 2.0 GHz
GPU integrated graphics ARM Mali-G57 MC2 Qualcomm Adreno 615
GPU execution units 2 2
GPU shading units 32 128
GPU base clock 950 MHz -
GPU boost clock 950 MHz 700 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 243.2 GFLOPS 358.4 GFLOPS
Memory 4 / 8 GB RAM 4 GB RAM
Storage 64 / 128 GB 64 GB
Memory card Up to 1,024 GB -
Photo 48 MP, f/1,8,
5 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4
12,2 MP, f/1,8, 28mm
Video 1152p@30fps 2160p30,
1080p30/60/120
Front photo 8 MP, f/2,0 8 MP, f/2,0, 24mm
Front video 1080p@30fps 1080p30
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth 5.0, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
USB USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity 5,000 mAh 3,700 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 12 hours ~ 14 hours and 40 minutes
TDP - 5 W
Head SAR - -
Body SAR - -
DxOMark - 101
AnTuTu 306,940 158,044
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,662 1,629
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
6,855 5,181
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is greater. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performances :


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.


AnTuTu - Total score
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G 306,940
Google Pixel 3a XL 158,044


The difference is 94%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G 2,662
6,855
Google Pixel 3a XL 1,629
5,181


In single core, the difference is 63%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 32%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.




GadgetVersus.com © 2022 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland