GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


Samsung Galaxy A20 vs Honor 9N

Samsung Galaxy A20 on Amazon USA
Honor 9N on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Samsung Galaxy A20 on one side and the Honor 9N on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 1.6GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.4GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4, as well as an average price.

Specifications:


Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A20 Honor 9N
Model version(s) SM-A205F/DS, SM-A205FN/DS LLD-AL20, Honor 9i
Release date Q1 2019 Q3 2018
Dimensions 6,24 x 2,94 x 0,31 in 5,87 x 2,83 x 0,30 in
Weight 5.96 oz 5.36 oz
Body Front glass,
plastic back
Front and back glass,
Aluminum frame
Screen size, colours 6.4 inches, 16M colours 5.8 inches, 16M colours
Screen type Super AMOLED IPS LCD
Resolution 720 x 1560 pixels 1080 x 2280 pixels
Screen ratio 19.5:9 19:9
Density 268 ppi 432 ppi
Operating system Android 9.0 Android 8.0
Processor Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 HiSilicon Kirin 659
Lithography 14nm FinFET 16 nm FinFET+
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 8
Energy cores 6x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.35 GHz 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.7 GHz
High performance cores 2x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 1.6 GHz 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.36 GHz
GPU ARM Mali-G71 MP2 ARM Mali-T830 MP2
GPU execution units 2 2
GPU shading units 32 32
GPU clock rate 1,300 MHz 600 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 49.3 GFLOPS 38.4 GFLOPS
Memory 3 GB RAM 3 / 4 GB RAM
Storage 32 GB 32 / 128 GB
Memory card Up to 1,000 GB Up to 256 GB
Photo 13 MP, f/1,9, 28mm,
5 MP, f/2,2, 12mm
13 MP,
2 MP
Video 1080p30 1080p30
Front photo 8 MP, f/2,0 16 MP
Front video 720p30 1080p30
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth 5.0, A2DP, LE 4.2, A2DP, LE
USB 2.0, Type-C 1.0 2.0
Battery capacity 4,000 mAh 3,000 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 15 hours and 50 minutes ~ 10 hours
TDP 8 W 6 W
Head SAR (US) - -
Body SAR (US) - -
AnTuTu 95,910 68,160
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
1,089 932
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
3,422 3,617
(Multi-core / price performance)
Performance / price ratio
23 pts / $ 15 pts / $
Note 4.2 / 5 4 / 5
Reviews 67 17
Amazon Samsung Galaxy A20 Honor 9N
(Average)
New price on Amazon
$150 -
(Average)
Used price on Amazon
- -
eBay Samsung Galaxy A20 Honor 9N
(Average)
New price on eBay
$180 $240
(Average)
Used price on eBay
$110 -


We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Honor 9N is larger. The Samsung Galaxy A20 has a newer release date.

Price: prices can change over time. For technical reasons, they are not updated in real time. This is only an average of the results on the first page of each product, whether new or used. Shipping costs have not been integrated. To know the final price of the product, please go to the form of the shop. If no price is indicated, it means that we did not find any offers during the last update.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Ratios: we first consider the average for the new price if available, the average for the used price otherwise.

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.


AnTuTu - Total score
Samsung Galaxy A20 95,910
Honor 9N 68,160


The difference is 41%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Honor 9N 932
3,617
Samsung Galaxy A20 1,089
3,422


In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 6%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask EspaƱa W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland