Samsung Galaxy A15 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G

Samsung Galaxy A15 5G on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G on one side and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.2GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneSamsung Galaxy A15 5G Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G
Model version(s)

SM-A156B, SM-A156B/DS, SM-A156E,
SM-A156E/DSN, SM-S156VL, SM-A156M,
SM-A156P, SM-A156P/DS, SM-A156P/N,
SM-A156P/DSN, SM-A156U, SM-A156U1,
SM-A156U1/DS, SM-A156W

2209116AG
Release dateQ4 2023 Q2 2023
Network5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,30 x 3,02 x 0,33 in 6,46 x 3,00 x 0,32 in
Weight7.05 oz 7.13 oz
BodyFront glass,
plastic body
Front glass,
plastic frame
Screen size, colours6.5 inches, 800 nits, 16M colours 6.7 inches, 700 nits, 1B colours
Screen typeSuper AMOLED, 90Hz AMOLED, 120Hz
Resolution1080 x 2340 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Screen ratio19.5:9 20:9
Density396 ppi 395 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 14; One UI 6 Android 11; MIUI 13
ProcessorMediaTek Dimensity 6100+ Qualcomm SM7150-AC Snapdragon 732G
Lithography6 nm N6 8 nm LPP
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz

6x Qualcomm Kryo 470 Silver @ 1.8 GHz
High performance cores

2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz

2x Qualcomm Kryo 470 Gold @ 2.3 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsARM Mali-G57 MC2 Qualcomm Adreno 618
GPU execution units2 2
GPU shading units32 128
GPU clock950 MHz 810 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point243.2 GFLOPS 422.4 GFLOPS
Memory4 / 8 GB RAM 6 / 8 GB RAM
Storage128 / 256 GB 128 / 256 GB
Memory cardUp to 1 TB -
Photo

50 MP, f/1,8,
5 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4

108 MP, f/1,9,
8 MP, 120,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4
Video

1080p@30fps

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60fps
Front photo

13 MP, f/2,0

16 MP, f/2,4
Front video

1080p@30fps

1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity5,000 mAh 5,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 14 hours ~ 15 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu389,741 354,883
Android PassMark Rating9,232 4,768
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
569 569
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
1,864 1,781
(Android)
Geekbench 6 single core
701 750
(Android)
Geekbench 6 multi-core
1,830 1,770
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, they have an identical turbo frequency. They were produced the same year.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G 389,741
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G 354,883


The difference is 10%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G 9,232
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G 4,768


The difference in performance is 94%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G 569
1,864
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G 569
1,781


In a single core, there is no noticeable difference. In multi-core, the differential gap is 5%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



With Android:

Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G 701
1,830
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G 750
1,770


In single core, the difference is -7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 3%.


Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads.






GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.