GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


Samsung Galaxy A10e vs Motorola Moto G7 Play

Samsung Galaxy A10e on Amazon USA
Motorola Moto G7 Play on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Samsung Galaxy A10e on one side and the Motorola Moto G7 Play on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 1.6GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.8GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.






Specifications:


Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A10e Motorola Moto G7 Play
Model version(s) SM-A102U, SM-A102U1, SM-S102DL XT1952, XT1952-2, XT1952-4
Release date Q3 2019 Q1 2019
Network CDMA, GSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions 5,80 x 2,74 x 0,33 in 5,80 x 2,81 x 0,31 in
Weight 4.97 oz 5.26 oz
Body Front glass,
plastic body
Front glass,
plastic back
Screen size, colours 5.8 inches, 16M colours 5.7 inches, 16M colours
Screen type PLS TFT IPS LCD
Resolution 720 x 1560 pixels 720 x 1512 pixels
Screen ratio 19.5:9 19:9
Density 295 ppi 294 ppi
Operating system Android 9.0 Android 9.0
Processor Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 Qualcomm SDM632 Snapdragon 632
Lithography 14nm FinFET 14 nm LPP
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 8
Energy cores 6x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.35 GHz 4x Qualcomm Kryo 250 Silver @ 1.8 GHz
High performance cores 2x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 1.6 GHz 4x Qualcomm Kryo 250 Gold @ 1.8 GHz
GPU integrated graphics ARM Mali-G71 MP2 Qualcomm Adreno 506
GPU execution units 2 1
GPU shading units 32 96
GPU base clock rate 770 MHz 725 MHz
GPU max clock rate 1,300 MHz 725 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 49.3 GFLOPS 124.8 GFLOPS
Memory 2 GB RAM 2 GB RAM
Storage 32 GB 32 GB
Memory card Up to 512 GB Up to 1,000 GB
Photo 8 MP, f/1,9 13 MP, f/2,0
Video 1080p30 2160p30,
1080p30
Front photo 5 MP, f/2,0 8 MP, f/2,2
Front video 720p30 1080p30
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Bluetooth 5.0, A2DP, LE 4.2, A2DP, LE
USB Micro USB 2.0, Type-C 1.0 Micro USB 2.0, Type-C 1.0
Battery capacity 3,000 mAh 3,000 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Ion Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 14 hours ~ 9 hours and 20 minutes
TDP 8 W 7 W
Head SAR - -
Body SAR - -
AnTuTu 88,710 98,830
Android PassMark Rating 1,730 1,830
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
1,108 1,194
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
3,438 4,091
Amazon
eBay




We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Motorola Moto G7 Play is larger. They were produced the same year.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.


AnTuTu - Total score
Motorola Moto G7 Play#ad 98,830
Samsung Galaxy A10e#ad 88,710


The difference is 11%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Motorola Moto G7 Play#ad 1,830
Samsung Galaxy A10e#ad 1,730


The difference in performance is 6%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Motorola Moto G7 Play 1,194
4,091
Samsung Galaxy A10e 1,108
3,438


In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 19%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

See also:

Samsung Galaxy A10Samsung Galaxy A10s




GadgetVersus.com © 2020 - Privacy policy - Advertising policy

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland