Realme Narzo 50i Prime vs Samsung Galaxy A3
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Realme Narzo 50i Prime on one side and the Samsung Galaxy A3 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 1.8GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Smartphone | | Realme Narzo 50i Prime |
| | | Samsung Galaxy A3 | | |
Model version(s) | |
RMX3506
| | | |
SM-A300F, SM-A300FU, SM-A300G,
SM-A300H, SM-A300HQ, SM-A300M,
SM-A300XU, SM-A300XZ, SM-A300Y,
SM-A300YZ
| | |
Release date | | Q2 2022 |
| | | Q4 2014 | | |
Network | | GSM, HSPA, LTE |
| | | GSM, HSPA, LTE | | |
Dimensions | | 6,46 x 2,98 x 0,33 in |
| | | 5,12 x 2,58 x 0,27 in | | |
Weight | | 6.42 oz |
| | | 3.88 oz | | |
Body | | Front glass,
plastic body |
| | | Front glass,
plastic back,
aluminum frame | | |
Screen size, colours | | 6.5 inches, 400 nits, 16M colours |
| | | 4.5 inches, 16M colours | | |
Screen type | | IPS LCD |
| | | Super AMOLED | | |
Resolution | | 720 x 1600 pixels |
| | | 540 x 960 pixels | | |
Screen ratio | | 20:9 |
| | | 16:9 | | |
Density | | 270 ppi |
| | | 245 ppi | | |
Operating system | | Android 11; Realme UI Go |
| | | Android 4.4.4 | | |
Processor | | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
| | | Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 | | |
Lithography | | 12 nm |
| | | 28 nm LP | | |
Cores | | 8 |
| | | 4 | | |
Threads | | 8 |
| | | 4 | | |
Energy cores | | 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.8 GHz
|
| | | -
| | |
High performance cores | | 2x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 1.8 GHz
|
| | | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.2 GHz
| | |
GPU integrated graphics | | ARM Mali-G57 MP1 |
| | | Qualcomm Adreno 306 | | |
GPU execution units | | 1 |
| | | 1 | | |
GPU shading units | | 16 |
| | | 24 | | |
GPU clock | | 650 MHz |
| | | 450 MHz | | |
GPU FP32 floating point | | 121.6 GFLOPS |
| | | 19.2 GFLOPS | | |
Memory | | 3 / 4 GB RAM |
| | | 1 / 1.5 GB RAM | | |
Storage | | 32 / 64 GB |
| | | 16 GB | | |
Memory card | | Up to 256 GB |
| | | Up to 64 GB |
| |
Photo | | 8 MP, f/2,0, 27mm
|
| | | 8 MP, f/2,4, 31mm
|
| |
Video | | 1080p@30fps
|
| | | 1080p@30fps
| | |
Front photo | | 5 MP, f/2,2, 27mm
|
| | | 5 MP, f/2,2, 23mm
|
| |
Front video | | 720p@30fps
|
| | | 1080p@30fps
| | |
WLAN | | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| | | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | | |
Bluetooth | | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| | | 4.0, A2DP, LE | | |
USB | | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| | | microUSB 2.0 | | |
Battery capacity | | 5,000 mAh |
| | | 1,900 mAh | | |
Battery type | | Non removable Li-Po |
| | | Non removable Li-Ion | | |
Battery life (versatile use) | | ~ 15 hours and 20 minutes |
| | | ~ 10 hours | | |
TDP | | - |
| | | 2 W | | |
Head SAR | | - |
| | | - | | |
Body SAR | | - |
| | | - | | |
AnTuTu | | 214,076 |
| | | 34,032 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 4 single core | | 1,494 |
| | | 473 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | | 4,672 |
| | | 1,042 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 5 single core | | 348 |
| | | 83 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | | 1,318 |
| | | 276 | | |
Amazon | |  |
| | |  |
| |
eBay | |  |
| | |  |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Realme Narzo 50i Prime has more cores, the maximum frequency of Realme Narzo 50i Prime is greater. The Realme Narzo 50i Prime has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
The difference is 529%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
With Android:In single core, the difference is 216%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 348%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
With Android:In single core, the difference is 319%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 378%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Samsung Galaxy A01Samsung Galaxy A01 CoreSamsung Galaxy A02Samsung Galaxy A02sSamsung Galaxy A03Samsung Galaxy A03 CoreSamsung Galaxy A03sSamsung Galaxy A04Samsung Galaxy A04eSamsung Galaxy A04sSamsung Galaxy A05Samsung Galaxy A05sSamsung Galaxy A10Samsung Galaxy A10eSamsung Galaxy A10sSamsung Galaxy A11Samsung Galaxy A12Samsung Galaxy A12 NachoSamsung Galaxy A12sSamsung Galaxy A13Samsung Galaxy A13 (MediaTek)Samsung Galaxy A13 5GSamsung Galaxy A14Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (MediaTek)Samsung Galaxy A14 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy A2 CoreSamsung Galaxy A20Samsung Galaxy A20eSamsung Galaxy A20sSamsung Galaxy A21Samsung Galaxy A21sSamsung Galaxy A22Samsung Galaxy A22 5GSamsung Galaxy A23Samsung Galaxy A23 5GSamsung Galaxy A24 4GSamsung Galaxy A3 (2016)Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017)Samsung Galaxy A3 CoreSamsung Galaxy A30Samsung Galaxy A30sSamsung Galaxy A31Samsung Galaxy A32Samsung Galaxy A32 5GSamsung Galaxy A33 5GSamsung Galaxy A34 5GSamsung Galaxy A40Samsung Galaxy A40sSamsung Galaxy A41Samsung Galaxy A42 5GSamsung Galaxy A5Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)Samsung Galaxy A50Samsung Galaxy A50sSamsung Galaxy A51Samsung Galaxy A51 5GSamsung Galaxy A52Samsung Galaxy A52 5GSamsung Galaxy A52s 5GSamsung Galaxy A53 5GSamsung Galaxy A54 5GSamsung Galaxy A6 (2018)Samsung Galaxy A6+ (2018)Samsung Galaxy A60Samsung Galaxy A6sSamsung Galaxy A7 (2016)Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)Samsung Galaxy A7 ExynosSamsung Galaxy A7 SD615Samsung Galaxy A70Samsung Galaxy A70sSamsung Galaxy A71Samsung Galaxy A71 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy A71 5G SD765GSamsung Galaxy A72Samsung Galaxy A73 5GSamsung Galaxy A8Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)Samsung Galaxy A8 StarSamsung Galaxy A8+ (2018)Samsung Galaxy A80Samsung Galaxy A8sSamsung Galaxy A9 (2016)Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)Samsung Galaxy A90 5GSamsung Galaxy Ace S5830Samsung Galaxy Alpha